Satya Sai Baba Archives

ExBaba Webmaster RFJ Sandt Libels Gerald Joe Moreno As Being Sexually Abused By Sathya Sai Baba

Reinier van der Sandt (who was recently exposed for massive copyright infringement) is the webmaster and registrant for the largest Anti-Sathya-Sai-Baba domains on the world wide web. Reinier van der Sandt owns and operates around twenty known Anti-Baba websites, webpages, blogs and/or groups.

On February 22nd 2010, Reinier van der Sandt (the “ExBaba Admin”) officially came forward and publicly libeled Gerald Joe Moreno as being “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba (213.10.134.161/rvdsandt/ex-baba/engels/witnesses/joe.html). When the webmaster and registrant for the largest Anti-Baba domains has the temerity to publicly disperse fabricated and fraudulent sexual abuse allegations against Gerald Joe Moreno, what does this say about the “integrity”, “crediblity” and “honesty” of the ExBaba Domain (which is universally cited as a “credible” source by Ex-Devotees and critics of Sai Baba)?

The following screencap documents Reinier van der Sandt’s falsified and fraudulent “sexual abuse” claims against Gerald Moreno:

Relevant Text:

213.10.134.161/rvdsandt/ex-baba/engels/witnesses/joe.html
Publication date: February 22, 2010
By: Ex Baba Admin (Reinier van der Sandt)

Gerald Joe Moreno was abused by Sai Baba, but just like more of Baba’s victims, he refuses to see the event as an ‘abuse’, nevertheless, we know that this is a normal way to deal with such peculiar but nasty and dreadful actions that happen on male devotees in Puttaparthi or Bangalore, and so he just belongs to the group of abused victims of Sathya Sai Baba.

If he agrees or not, he was: sexually abused, and he knows what abuse is, because he admits that Sathya Sai Baba is in fact sexually abuse men, here in Moreno’s own words;

SSB did sexually abuse men.

On http://www.saibabaexpose.com/Prem3a.htm you can read more about how this works, Basava Premanand has a clear view on Moreno’s situation.

Moreno is hopelessly trying refute the fact that he was abused, well, what initially happens with every abused victim actually and what must be seen as sexual abuse, happens on him too, here we may read that in his own words:

You see, the lower stomach lies in the area just above the male genitalia and by performing that ceremony – the trousers have to be lowered first – Sai Baba can easily get access just by looking at the the sexual organ, in order to measure up the format and state of the man’s penis, this, we conclude, is already a sexual abuse !

Please take notice of Robert Priddy’s opinion on the abuse of Gerald Joe Moreno:

Important are these words Priddy writes: ‘Moreno did not perceive it as such, but few who go into the private room behind closed doors believing Sathya Sai Baba to be a divinity seldom do.

Additionally we may write down here, that Moreno might have changed the text in his advantage, which came from the original ‘Personal Geocities Website’ as he states, but which can’t be obtained, because the website isn’t there anymore.

From the above we may conclude that Gerald Joe Moreno was indeed sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba from India, which already happened on Joe’s 18th in 1988 !

Gerald Joe Moreno Was NEVER Sexually Abused By Sathya Sai Baba

Needless to say, Gerald Joe Moreno has been refuting Ex-Devotee’s repetitive “sexual molestation” libels going back to July 2006:

• Moreno Refutes Being Sexually Abused By Sathya Sai Baba
• Is Robert Priddy A Latent Homosexual? (View Blog Version)
• Robert Priddy Falsifies Sexual Molestation Claim (View Blog Version)
• Robert C. Priddy’s Homoerotic Genital Oilings Fascination (View Blog Version)
• Sai Petition And More Sexual Abuse Libels (View Blog Version)
• Dirty Old Man Robert Priddy (View Blog Version)
• Alleged Sexual Molestation Victim Of Sai Baba Comes Forward With A Shocking Revelation
• Full Response To Sanjay Kishore Dadlani (View Blog Version)
• Sanjay Dadlani: More Lies – Trying To Keep Up

Gerald Joe Moreno’s GeoCities Webpages

Joe Moreno’s GeoCities webpages were online from late 2001 through October 27th 2009 (when GeoCities officially closed down). Archive.org indexed Moreno’s GeoCities webpages from October 18th 2003 to March 8th 2008. Moreno had archive.org block his GeoCities website on October 21st 2009 due to screencap fraud perpetrated by Robert Priddy, Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson and Reinier van der Sandt.

Gerald Moreno published his interview experience (as duplicated from his GeoCities webpage) on his sathyasaibaba WordPress blog on May 1st 2008 (Reference) and made full screencaps to the page as well (Reference).

Reinier van der Sandt was the very first person who went about screencapturing Moreno’s GeoCities webpages in January 2005 and even published Moreno’s GeoCities picture on shaster.atspace.com (which was deleted after a complaint filed by Moreno). Therefore, Reinier van der Sandt knew about and screencaptured Moreno’s GeoCities webpages from at least January 2005 through October 27th 2009 (the date when Geocities officially closed down). So when Reinier van der Sandt claimed that Moreno may have changed information on his GeoCities webpages, he is lying through his teeth.

Prior to the close of GeoCities, neither Conny Larsson, Robert Priddy or Reinier van der Sandt claimed that Moreno changed the information on his GeoCities webpages. Now that GeoCities closed, Reinier van der Sandt is claiming that Moreno may have changed information on his GeoCities webpages!

Since Conny Larsson & Robert Priddy claim to possess full screencaps to Moreno’s GeoCities webpages, why don’t they show where Moreno changed the text? The fact of the matter is that Larsson, Priddy & Sandt adamantly refuse to publish the full screencaps they claim they possess (despite an open challenge by Moreno) for reasons left unknown.

Renier van der Sandt Is A Known Con Man

It is an irrefutable fact that Reinier van der Sandt is a known fraud and a pathological liar. One small example (out of dozens): RFJ Sandt used numerous fake names on the former sathyasaibaba2 Yahoo Group. RFJ Sandt fully acknowledged using fake names and said:

Reinier Van Der Sandt: “Allright, you win, Joe (Gerald) Moreno is right… I have made these pages, and Joe is right, all the YAHOO ID’s and the IP are mine, I use them to show my view on the truth, but I will change this, in future I will be only using my name on these sites and the different ID’s will be deleted by me, ok?” (Reference)

The following list of fraudulent names were the ones used by RFJ van der Sandt on the former sathyasaibaba2 Yahoo Group (with which Sandt conversed with himself and even praised himself!):

• sloppyjoemoreno (26 posts)
• webmasterexbabacom (5 posts)
• rvdsandt2003 (200 posts)
• rvdsandt2004 (112 posts)
• end_of_baba (12 posts)
• rapistanddemonsathyasaibaba (336 posts)
• neutral_individual (6 posts)
• finddewittinthepizza (2 posts)
• reiniervandersandt (298 posts)
• reiniervdsandt (204 posts)
• truthaboutbaba (42 posts)

This is the type of con-man that is trying to make the case that Joe Moreno was “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba.

RFJ Sandt Admissions & Disturbing Views About Child Pornography

Reinier van der Sandt openly admitted to looking for child porn websites to see how easy they were to find! Reinier van der Sandt said (underlined emphasis added by Moreno):

Reinier Van Der Sandt: “I found lots of kiddy porno-sites with very much child porn pics, but…, but… it was impossible for me to watch it for very long, because when I was clicking on an image to enlarge, other pages were popping up so fast on my computer screen, that I could not open such a site, in fact, all kiddy porno sites – as what I have seen of it – have multi pop up techniques, which makes it difficult for the kiddy porno watcher to watch easily…” (Reference)

WHY would Reinier van der Sandt want to peruse any porn site and enlarge thumbnail pictures of children being sexually abused? Perhaps this has to do with RFJ Sand’s self-admission of having a pornography problem that settingcaptivesfree helped him overcome? As if this isn’t disgusting enough, R.V.D. Sandt said (underlined emphasis added by Moreno):

Reinier Van Der Sandt: “Only in the opening pages I saw some kiddy porn, when I wanted to continue and see more, I had to suscribe and/or pay.” (Reference)

Reinier vander Sandt tried to justify viewing illegal child porn sites by saying:

Reinier Van Der Sandt: “Internet kiddy porno can be obtained, I have to correct myself on what I was previously writing on this board, I have been looking for kiddy porn on the internet – NOT AS A CUSTOMER, BUT BECAUSE I WANTED TO FIND OUT WHETHER ONE CAN OBTAIN EASILY FILTHY KIDDIE PORNO!!!” (Reference)

Apparently Reinier Van Der Sandt found the “filthy kiddie porno” he sought. But that was not enough! RVD Sandt found “lots of kiddie porno sites”, “wanted to continue and see more” and even tried to enlarge pictures of children being sexually abused! Reinier Van Der Sandt justified his behavior by saying what he did was alright because he was “not a customer”! RVD Sandt is saying it is OKAY to view child pornography as long as you are not a “customer”! The IWF specifically states that child pornography is illegal content!

This is the type of pervert that is trying to make the case that Joe Moreno was “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba. Apparently, porn-addict Reinier van der Sandt is projecting his pornographic fantasies onto Moreno.

To Date: Pseudo-Moralists Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy adamantly refuse to say one word about Reinier Van Der Sandt’s admissions to viewing illegal child pornography, using fake names and having a pornography addiction.

ExBaba Sexual Abuse Libels – In Conclusion

The big question left unanswered:

What other sexual abuse allegations are Reinier van der Sandt, Robert Priddy, Barry Pittard, Alan Kazlev, Sanjay Dadlani, Tony O’Clery, Barbara Dent, UsedByBaba and the Ex-Baba Domain fabricating and falsifying against Sathya Sai Baba like they did against Moreno?

To Date: Not even one Anti-Sai Activist has come forward reprimanding Ex-Devotees for their fraudulent, falsified and gutter accusations against Moreno, proving that the Anti-Sai Movement is thoroughly corrupt and relies on fanatic devotion to an Anti-Sai agenda that is based on subterfuge, deceit and blatant dishonesty.

Critics like Timothy Conway, Serguei Badaev, Brian Steel, Andries Krugers Dagneaux, Lisa Tice, Hans de Kraker, Dennis Hanisch, David Lyons, Reidun Priddy, Al & Marisa Rahm, Barbara Shocket and Dhanyi Jo Sinclair, etc., publicly endorse these shameless liars and are thereby guilty through association and guilty through silence with those making fraudulent and falsified sexual abuse libels against Moreno.

Gerald Joe Moreno, Vishvarupa.com, Robert Priddy And Public Deception

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba who once hailed the the guru as God Incarnate and thereby the Father who sent Jesus, Allah who sent Muhammad and the Creator of the Universe) wrote an article on his Anti-Baba WordPress blog accusing Gerald Joe Moreno of professing belief that Sathya Sai Baba is “vishvarupa”. Let us take a closer look at Robert Priddy’s so-called “facts”.

Because Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees continually misrepresented Moreno and his vishvarupa.com domain (purposely misspelling it as vishwarupa: Ref), Moreno optimized his vishvarupa.com index page with relevant information and keywords about the Sai Controversy, hence the title “Sai Vishvarupa – Directory to Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba”.

Based on this webpage title, Robert Priddy raised a huge wail, gnashed his teeth and foamed-at-the-mouth, accusing Gerald Joe Moreno of saying he believes that Sathya Sai Baba is vishvarupa! Of course, Moreno never made that claim. Robert Priddy is basing his entire argument on a title description that included the domain name (i.e., “vishvarupa”)!

Robert Priddy’s Bogus Sai Organization Domain

Robert Priddy purposely withheld the fact that he purchased a domain name entitled saibaba.org.uk, which shamelessly attempted to mislead readers into thinking his Anti-Baba website was an official UK Sai Organisation domain. Needless to say, Robert Priddy was challenged legally and lost the saibaba.org.uk domain through legitimate and legal venues. Consequently, Robert Priddy created the saibaba-x.org.uk domain. Therefore, who exactly is guilty of public deception and deceit?

Robert Priddy Solicited Sai Baba As “Vishvarupa” As An Ex-Devotee!

When Robert Priddy became an Ex-Devotee, he purposely attempted to mislead unsuspecting Sai Devotees by luring them to his Anti-Baba website through a deceptive tripod webpage that superficially glorified Sathya Sai Baba as Vishvarupa! The relevant picture said “With hands, feet, eye, head, mouth and ears pervading everything, he permeates the entire universe” (which is the description for Lord Krishna’s vishvarupa darshanam)!

Robert Priddy’s deceptive tripod webpage stated (yes, when he was already an Ex-Devotee):

TEACHINGS AND PHOTOS OF BHAGAWAN SRI SATHYA SAI BABA, THE ONLY ONE ‘GOD INCARNATE’

THE MOST MAGNIFICENT PERSON EVER TO WALK THE EARTH RESIDES AT THE ABODE OF SUPREME PEACE IN PUTTAPARTHI, ANDHRA PRADESH, INDIA. THE MOST INFLUENTIAL, POWERFUL AND RICH SPIRITUAL FIGURE IN THE WORLD SHOWS HIS SPLENDOUR. WE HUMBLY BRING YOU SOME PHOTOGRAPHS OF OUR LORD GOD ON SOME OF HIS MANY THRONES AND OTHER PROOFS OF HIS DIVINE PROSPERITY AND THE WORSHIPFUL AWE HE IS HELD IN.

TEXT – UNIQUE PHOTOGRAPHS

Teachings: Swami’s mystic nature & prophesies SET 1
The Glory of Swami’s chariots SET 4
Swami’s Holy Residences
Teachings: Swami’s nature and His Organisation SET 2
The Divine reclines on His Thrones
SET 5 Swami’s Magnificent Buildings
SET 3 Swami accepts food offerings SET
6 Swami’s Own Glory

Sathya Sai Baba with his devotees, the Indian Government. Holding his hand is Home Minister L.K. Advani (Leader of the Bharatiya Janata Party) and on his left, Prime Minister Beta Vihari Vajpayee.

e avatar, our Lord, Father of Jesus Christ, Krishna, Rama, Vishnu & Dattatreya. lives at Prashanthi Nilayam, Puttaparthi, Andhra Pradesh, India, & Brindavan, Whitefield, near Bangalore

(Archive.org Reference)

Tripod caught Robert Priddy in his blatant act of deceit and deleted his page for violating their terms and conditions!

Using Robert Priddy’s logic (that he used against Moreno), one MUST conclude that Robert Priddy as an Ex-Devotee fully believes that Sathya Sai Baba is God and Vishvarupa. Why else would he make those claims as an Ex-Devotee?

If it looks like a snake, slithers like a snake and hisses like snake…It’s A Snake!

Robert Priddy Cannot Vindicate His Claims With Factual Information

Robert Priddy perpetuates the lie that Gerald Joe Moreno somehow duped archive.org into archiving select information on his vishvarupa.com domain. To Date: Robert Priddy cannot provide a scintilla of proof to substantiate his claim.

Robert Priddy also perpetuates the lie that Moreno published his personal experiences with Sathya Sai Baba on his vishvarupa.com domain. Needless to say, Robert Priddy also claimed he is in possession of full screencaps to Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain that contain the alleged material in question. For reasons unknown (and which Robert Priddy adamantly refuses to explain), Robert Priddy does not publish the relevant & full screencaps to vindicate his claims. The only screencap that Robert Priddy released so far was of a fraudulent and falsified screencap.

Robert Priddy – Concluding Statement

Needless to say, LSD advocate Robert Priddy has a long and established history of distortions, lies, defamations and libels.

• Robert C. Priddy is a laughable pervert who had the audacity to fabricate sexual molestation claims against Gerald Joe Moreno.
• Robert C. Priddy is a laughable con-artist who published fraudulent screencaps against Gerald Joe Moreno and adamantly refuses to vindicate his claims by publishing full screencaps to Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain.
• Robert C. Priddy is a laughable stooge who attributed his own computer’s IP to Gerald Joe Moreno.
• Robert C. Priddy is in perpetual denial and publicly defends his laughable SheilaWaring Lie even though other critics have distanced themselves from that controversy.
• Robert Priddy is a laughable LSD Advocate who even cited a Pro-Drug Forum intended for Drug Users to defend his LSD-induced hallucinations.
• Robert Priddy is a malicious defamer who was sent packing with his tail between his legs when Leo Rebello Threatened Him With A $1,000,000 Lawsuit For Defamation.
• Senile Robert Priddy stated that Moreno claimed he was sexually abused under his Joe Apodaca SaiPetition.net Submission even though Moreno never made such a claim.
• Robert Priddy is a Pseudo-Moralist Clown who loves to attack others for composite images while endorsing and publishing composite images himself!
• Robert Priddy delusionally claimed that Sathya Sai Baba Personally Invited Him To India.
• Robert Priddy formerly Worshipped & Kissed Sathya Sai Baba’s feet.
• Robert Priddy Maliciously Lied About Joy Thomas and refuses to retract his bold-faced lies.
• Robert Priddy claimed he had a Telepathic Connection To Sathya Sai Baba.
• Robert Priddy documented a Homoerotic Dream With His Former Guru that involved the guru sucking up and swallowing a substance associated with his sex chakra!
• The list goes on and on.

Of course, none of these things are surprising considering that Robert Priddy is an LSD Advocate who is thoroughly obsessed with genital oilings and who relishes projecting his homoerotic fantasies onto Moreno. Robert Priddy is allied with Bisexual & Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson and Child Porn Purveyor RFJ Sandt and Perverted Fetishist Sanjay Dadlani. Robert Priddy is also a staunch promoter of New Age Advocate & Reincarnator Alan Kazlev and Guru & UFO Promoter Timothy Conway (who actually believes that Sathya Sai Baba may have molested alleged victims like aliens are alleged to do through abductions!).

The only people guilty of running “massive disinformation and cover-up campaigns” are Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees who have attacked hundreds of Sai Devotees & Non-Devotees alike and who have created hundreds of webpages to defame, libel and smear Gerald Joe Moreno. What more can one do but laugh at loud at Robert Priddy and his hypocritical finger-pointing?

Robert Priddy, Black Magic, Leprechauns, Elementals And Sai Baba

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic, defamer and Ex-Devotee) wrote an article claiming that Sathya Sai Baba is “One of those many ignorami who sustain and spread false beliefs about the powers of black magicians and witches.”

Apparently, Robert Priddy was also “one of those many ignorami who sustained and spread false beliefs about black magicians and witches” because he was an ardent follower and practitioner of Sathya Sai Baba’s teachings for 17 -26 years!

Robert Priddy said he studied Sathya Sai Baba’s life and teachings to such an extent, no one could better his knowledge about Sathya Sai Baba:

Robert Priddy: “I knew his own words extremely well from my more intensive 20-year study and constant detailed indexing of his discourses, and I never happened across anyone in the Sai movement during 20 years who could better my knowledge of his actual words and teaching…”

This statement is very revealing and shows how Robert Priddy’s alleged devotion to Sathya Sai Baba was actually some sort of egotistical competition in which he viewed himself as intellectually superior to all others. Robert Priddy actually believed that he alone was an expert when it came to Sathya Sai Baba’s “actual words and teachings” although he could not read, write or understand Telugu (Sathya Sai Baba’s native language)! Talk about delusions of grandeur!

About Sathya Sai Baba’s teachings, Robert Priddy said in Chapter 22 of his Pro-Sai book Source Of The Dream:

Robert Priddy: “No one to my knowledge gives such directly simple, yet deceptively deep and subtle, answers to the most enigmatic of questions, nor does so in more straightforward and powerfully-convincing ways than does Baba…No spiritually-interested person who reads Sai discourses or writings can fail to be impressed by the clarity and simplicity of these teachings, which bear comparison with any known higher spiritual teaching…Some insights surpass those to be found in any scripture or comparable work known, at least, to the present writer…”

A rock-solid endorsement to the impressive and striking power of Sathya Sai Baba’s teaching by the self-professed expert who “never happened across anyone in the Sai movement during 20 years who could better his knowledge of Sathya Sai Baba’s actual words and teaching”!

Robert Priddy claimed to have studied Baba’s teaching in such depth that he compiled an index (over the course of many years) entitled “Back to the Source” that contained Eighteen Thousand “separately-detailed entries” to Baba’s teachings. So if Sathya Sai Baba is an ignorant person who spreads primitive beliefs in black magic and witches, this does not reflect well on Robert Priddy’s intelligence and mental state when he was a former devotee of Sathya Sai Baba for 17 -26 years!

While Gerald Joe Moreno reviewed his archived copy of Robert Priddy’s index “Back To The Source”, he discovered that Priddy actually made reference to “black magic”, “demons”, “evil” and “magic” (meaning that while Priddy was a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba, he was fully aware of of these teachings and thought they were worthy of being referenced)! The extractions read as follows:

“Black magic not inflicted on Sai (heart attacks) 26 S3 16-93 S3
Demon & man, differences between (the 3 Da’s) 396f S4 29-157 S5
Demonic type of person: ego/pride/hurtful 2 San 1-93 39-396 S25
Demons as symbol of evil thoughts, feelings, acts 198 San 8-95 19-204 S28
Evil: bring Me all the evil in you & leave it 176 S1 29-181 S1
Evil & egoism etc. poured into the yagna fire 76 V of Div
Evil forces, the product of grief 165 S3 4-23 S4
Evil & good both have right to exist 31 S3 17-99 S3
Evil & good, has ever been a struggle between 4 Geetha-V
Evil & good in world are both Divine expressions 37 San 2-95 1-1f S28
Evil habits: one leads to a whole gang of them 161 S7b 2-14 S11
Evil has potentiality to become good, remember 92 S1 15-89 S1
Evil: How does God, the ruler, permit it? 48f SSai-V
Evil in others, do not seek to discover 70f S10 24-156 S13
Evil in you manifests an obstacle in your path 118 S9 36-211 S12
Evil is from the ego, not from God 216 MyB&I 206 Convers
Evil is to be transformed by good association 32 S3 17-99 S3
Evil looks, thoughts, speech: try to give them up – - 9-75 S19
Evil: none exists except in man’s activities 293 San 11-85 – -
Evil: none free from its taint/all need correcting 3 S4 1-4 S3
Evil now widespread & unconfined 153 S3 2-12 S4
Evil, ogres of 194 Bhagav-V
Evil: see, hear, think, talk, do no evil 187 San 7-91 11-122 S24
Evil: see, talk, hear, think, do no evil – but only good 1-7 Kodai-98 – -
Evil traits of many lives not instantly wiped out 39 S11 55-348 S14
Evil traits through many lives & generations 39 S11 – -
Evil used for purpose it’s suited to 31 S3 17-99 S3
Evil will be destroyed by Sai 153 S3 2-12 S4
Evil won’t affect the compassionate, true server 113 San 5-93 14-138 S26
Evil-doers, now no question of extermination of 23 S2 2-5 S2
Evil-minded elders, avoid (even if your own parents) 131 San 5-99
Magic; both black & white types do exist 227 S4 49-285 S4
Magic, miracle outwardly & leela inwardly 100 S2 18-91 S2”

Right out of Robert Priddy’s own mouth when he was a devotee and among the “ignorami who sustain and spread false beliefs about the powers of black magicians and witches”!

Robert Priddy – The True Believer In Gnomes & Fairies

Click Here to read an amusing article written by Robert Priddy (going back to 1988) in which he sustained and spread false beliefs about “elves, fairies, leprechauns, gnomes, trolls, water spirits, animal and plant spirits or ‘devas’, angels, invisible helpers, shaman ’spirits’, ‘allies’, UFOs, extra-terrestrials, possessive demons, Satan, Pan-figures and other demi-gods”! Robert Priddy is a deeply conflicted person who not only criticizes others for their beliefs, but attempts (very hard) to suppress information about his beliefs that would include him among the ranks of “ignorami” who sustain and spread false beliefs in superstitious phenomena (even believing that a lizard and butterfly were supernatural manifestations of elemental spirits)!

Although Robert Priddy attempts to con the general public into thinking he is entirely given to scientific reasoning, he is actually a true believer and a fierce defender, promoter, endorser, solicitor and friend of various self-professed psychics, trance mediums, reiki healers, guru wannabees, superstitionists, eccentric spiritualists, astrologers (including his own son, Kai Nicolai Priddy, who is heavily into astrology and is the webmaster for AbacusAstrology.co.uk) and other “lunatic fringe” Baba bashers.

Robert Priddy promotes, endorses and/or professes friendship with:

1. Trance Channeler & Self-Proclaimed Prophet Conny Larsson
2. Guru Promoter, UFO Conspiracist & True Believer PhD Timothy Conway
3. New Age Advocate & Reincarnator Alan Kazlev
4. Self-Proclaimed Spiritual Master ‘Ramana Baba’
5. Ramtha Devotee Ullrich Zimmermann
6. Fetishist & Hare Krsna Congregational Member Sanjay Dadlani
7. Reiki Master And Spiritual Healer Yaman Konuralp

As a matter of fact, when Robert Priddy attempts to defend himself against Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist) he directs his readers to either:

1. Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson’s website (located at saibabaexpose.com)
2. Reincarnator, New Age Advocate and Grungy Integral Philosopher Alan Kazlev’s website (located at kheper.net)

How’s that for “scientific” or “rational”? Robert Priddy is obviously a very gullible and naive “true believer” who is willing to give credence to non-scientific beliefs by claiming that trance mediums, self-proclaimed prophets, aura readers, seance conductors, New Age advocates, guru adherents, self-proclaimed reincarnators and the like are intelligent, honest, credible and reliable individuals worthy of being referenced by him (a so-called “scholar” and “academic” not given to lunatic fringe or superstitious beliefs)! To Date: Robert Priddy adamantly refuses to say one word about his promotion and endorsement of these “lunatic fringe” (Priddy’s favorite slur) individuals.

Concluding Statement: Robert Priddy The Con Artist

Needless to say, LSD advocate Robert Priddy has a long and established history of distortions, lies, defamations and libels.

• Robert C. Priddy is a laughable pervert who had the audacity to fabricate sexual molestation claims against Gerald Joe Moreno.
• Robert C. Priddy is a laughable con-artist who published fraudulent screencaps against Gerald Joe Moreno and adamantly refuses to vindicate his claims by publishing full screencaps to Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain.
• Robert C. Priddy is a laughable stooge who attributed his own computer’s IP to Gerald Joe Moreno.
• Robert C. Priddy is in perpetual denial and publicly defends his laughable SheilaWaring Lie even though other critics have distanced themselves from that controversy.
• Robert Priddy is a laughable LSD Advocate who even cited a Pro-Drug Forum intended for Drug Users to defend his LSD-induced hallucinations.
• Robert Priddy is a malicious defamer who was sent packing with his tail between his legs when Leo Rebello Threatened Him With A $1,000,000 Lawsuit For Defamation.
• Senile Robert Priddy stated that Moreno claimed he was sexually abused under his Joe Apodaca SaiPetition.net Submission even though Moreno never made such a claim.
• Robert Priddy is a Pseudo-Moralist Clown who loves to attack others for composite images while endorsing and publishing composite images himself!
• Robert Priddy delusionally claimed that Sathya Sai Baba Personally Invited Him To India.
• Robert Priddy formerly Worshipped & Kissed Sathya Sai Baba’s feet.
• Robert Priddy Maliciously Lied About Joy Thomas and refuses to retract his bold-faced lies.
• Robert Priddy claimed he had a Telepathic Connection To Sathya Sai Baba.
• Robert Priddy documented a Homoerotic Dream With His Former Guru that involved the guru sucking up and swallowing a substance associated with his sex chakra!
• The list goes on and on.

Of course, none of these things are surprising considering that Robert Priddy is an LSD Advocate who is thoroughly obsessed with genital oilings and who relishes projecting his homoerotic fantasies onto Moreno. Robert Priddy is allied with Bisexual & Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson and Child Porn Purveyor RFJ Sandt and Perverted Fetishist Sanjay Dadlani. Robert Priddy is also a staunch promoter of New Age Advocate & Reincarnator Alan Kazlev and Guru & UFO Promoter Timothy Conway (who actually believes that Sathya Sai Baba may have molested alleged victims like aliens are alleged to do through abductions!).

The only people guilty of running “massive disinformation and cover-up campaigns” are Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees who have attacked hundreds of Sai Devotees & Non-Devotees alike and who have created hundreds of webpages to defame, libel and smear Gerald Joe Moreno. What more can one do but laugh at loud at Robert Priddy and his hypocritical finger-pointing?

The Homoerotic Fantasizer Robert Priddy

Dear Friends And Fellow Readers,

This article is very important for several reasons. First, it documents the vicious behaviors of Ex-Devotees of Sathya Sai Baba (who often claim they are “credible”, “honest,” and “sincere” individuals). Secondly, this article is important because it documents the unbelievable extents that Ex-Devotees of Sathya Sai Baba will go in order to malign, defame and libel others. Lastly, this article is important because it reveals the dubious standards that Ex-Devotees use to determine what they consider “sexual abuse” and/or “sexual molestation”.

Since former followers of Sathya Sai Baba unremittingly and falsely accuse Gerald ‘Joe’ Moreno of being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba, Moreno’s story is unique and provides a revealing and telltale glimpse into the mindset, fanaticism and extremism that altogether exemplifies the Anti-Sathya-Sai-Baba Movement.

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba who once hailed the Guru as God Incarnate and who once fervently Worshipped And Kissed The Guru’s Feet) wrote more blatant disinformation on his Anti-Baba blog about Gerald Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist).

The case is easily made that Robert Priddy is a bitter, vindictive and sexually-debauched defamer and propagator of disinformation against Gerald Joe Moreno (henceforth referred to as “Moreno”). Ex-Devotee’s willful, malicious and obsessive claims about Moreno being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba has undeniably cast a dark shadow of suspicion and doubt on their self-professed and alleged “credibility”, “honesty” and “sincerity”.

Moreno has refuted the “sexual molestation” libels against him going back to July 2006. See:

1. Moreno Refutes Allegations Of Sexual Abuse
2. Sai Baba Critic Robert Priddy Openly Falsifies Molestation Claim
3. Sai Baba Critic Robert Priddy Falsifies Information About Joe Apodaca Signature
4. Robert Priddy – A Dirty Old Man
5. Gerald Joe Moreno Responds To Sanjay Dadlani

Let us take a look at what Robert Priddy wrote on September 26th 2009 (underlined and bold emphasis added by Moreno):

robertpriddy.wordpress.com/2009/09/26/gerald-morenos-wildest-attack-so-far
Robert Priddy: “His biggest point in his overwrought blog is that I wrote that Sai Baba pulled down his pants – which statement I did not attribute to him as he also claims.”

Let us take a look at what Robert Priddy wrote on April 1st 2009, which is still located on his blog as of October 14th 2009 (underlined emphasis added by Moreno):

robertpriddy.wordpress.com/2009/04/01/sathyasaibaba-specious-claims-and-self-defeating-arguments/
Robert Priddy: “Moreno has himself described how his pants were lowered by Sathya Sai Baba lowered and he was ‘oiled’ on his ‘lower stomach’.”

Therefore, Robert Priddy did in fact claim that Moreno “himself described how his pants were lowered by Sathya Sai Baba” (a bold-faced and gutter untruth and libel). Now, however, Robert Priddy would have everyone believe that he never attributed the “Sai Baba pulled down his pants” comment to Moreno when in fact he did attribute that comment to Moreno. This is the type of typical sleaze and typical disinformation that Robert Priddy peddles to unsuspecting readers on his Anti-Baba blogs and Anti-Baba websites on almost a daily (sometimes twice-daily) basis.

Robert Priddy is so forgetful, he cannot even recall what he wrote and what he said about Moreno. It would appear that Robert Priddy is exhibiting signs and symptoms that strongly suggest his mental faculties are failing him. Robert Priddy’s numerous “Not So Priddy Blunders” are fully documented on Moreno’s webpage entitled: Robert Priddy – Oslo, Norway.

Robert Priddy’s Homoerotic Imaginations

Now, let us take a look at Robert Priddy’s sexually-twisted and sexually-focused homoerotic imaginations relating to Moreno’s interview with Sathya Sai Baba:

Robert Priddy: “Nonetheless, I hold that Sai Baba MUST, in one way or another got to lower Moreno’s pants. He is reported as pulling down pants by many of those who describe molestations. To those who have not been to a Sai Baba interview, know that no young man [since at least the 1970s] could ever get into an interview with Sathya Sai Baba unless dressed in the traditional Indian white so-called ‘pyjama suit’ (usually of cotton, as seen in countless videos) The trousers are kepy up by a string tied at the front, or a belt in some less usual cases. Therefore, for Sai Baba to be able to massage ‘the lower stomach‘ it was customary (according to numerous testimonies) for him to require that the knot be undone and the cotton ‘pyjama’ lowered. To put his hand down the trouser without loosening the string would be extremely unusual (and would itself constitute as bad a violation as pulling down the young man’s pants). Now, whether Sai Baba asked or motioned to Joe Moreno to drop his pants, or whether he pulled the bow fastener himself is a matter of no consequence. He got where he wanted to go. His authority with those who believe him to be a great soul – and usually God Incarnate – means he can and does in effect ‘pull down pants’, however it is done. Moreno claims Sai Baba did not pull them down. This is only an attempt at an adroit avoidance of the issue – he was oiled on the lower stomach (by his own admission).”

Robert Priddy argued that Sathya Sai Baba “MUST” have lowered Moreno’s pants because others alleged it happened to them. This “MUST” mean that anyone who has ever had a private interview with Sathya Sai Baba “MUST” have had their pants lowered as well, which brings us to Robert Priddy’s private interviews. Did Sathya Sai Baba similarly lower Robert Priddy’s pants and is he “too embarrassed” to talk about it? It does not matter what excuses, defenses, denials or refutations Robert Priddy gave or will give, his private interviews “MUST” be viewed in the exact manner as he views Moreno’s private interview.

1. Just as Robert Priddy denies Moreno’s first-hand account, one must similarly deny Robert Priddy’s first-hand account.
2. Just as Robert Priddy ignores Moreno’s claims of not being sexually molested by Sathya Sai Baba, one must similarly ignore Robert Priddy’s claims of not being sexually molested by Sathya Sai Baba.
3. Just as Robert Priddy concludes that Moreno is “too embarrassed” to talk about being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba, one must similarly conclude that Robert Priddy is “too embarrassed” to talk about being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba.

Needless to say, Moreno does not believe that Robert Priddy was molested by Sathya Sai Baba. Rather, Moreno is attempting to show how Robert Priddy’s self-serving and irrational arguments could be mirrored back at him and would implicate him in the very same situation he tries to place Moreno.

Robert Priddy has never been able to refute or shake off similar accusations made against him by Leo Rebello. See: Leo Rebello’s $1,000,000 Legal Threat For Defamation Against Robert Priddy.

Let it go on record that Moreno did not wear white pajama clothing on his first visit to see Sathya Sai Baba and most certainly did not wear white pajama clothing in his interview with the Guru. As a matter of fact, Moreno was wearing grey jeans with a belt and a grey button-down shirt! Since Moreno was new to Sathya Sai Baba’s ashram, he did not dress in white pajama clothing like other devotees because he did not originally plan to visit the Guru (Moreno visited Sathya Sai Baba only after a miraculous experience he had while in Calcutta). Although Moreno was advised (several times) to wear white pajama clothing at the Guru’s ashram, he could not find any clothing that fit him properly and decided to wear his own Western clothes instead.

Since Robert Priddy is a sexually imbalanced person who relies on homosexual fantasies and homosexual imaginations to make his arguments against Moreno, it is not really surprising that Robert Priddy considers the belly button to be part of one’s genitals!

Robert Priddy is absolutely clueless about the details of Moreno’s interview. Robert Priddy actually had the audacity to fabricate stories against Moreno by resorting to assumption, speculation and conspiracy. If Ex-Devotee’s have the audacity to fabricate sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other sexual molestation claims are they fabricating as well?

Moreno has consistently and repeatedly denied Ex-Devotee’s absurd claims that Sathya Sai Baba pulled down his pants. Even though Moreno’s statements are well documented, Robert Priddy continues to argue (like a drooling and insatiable pervert in utter denial) that Moreno’s first-hand account is to be rejected while Priddy’s libidinous speculations are to be accepted! This is the Golden Standard that Ex-Devotees use to determine who has been “sexually abused” or “sexually molested” by Sathya Sai Baba.

Robert Priddy’s Disturbing Homosexual Fantasies

Robert Priddy is a big advocate of psychological projection and often uses “psychological projection” as an argument to defend himself and belittle his detractors. Using the argument of “psychological projection”, Robert Priddy appears to be 100% “projecting” latent homosexual desires onto Moreno that are manifesting as obscene, erotic and explicit homosexual fantasies that involve his former Guru.

All of Robert Priddy’s graphic and sexual descriptions about what he speculated and imagined happened to Moreno in his interview with Sathya Sai Baba arise solely from Priddy’s groin and not from any factual, verifiable or known writings from Moreno.

Robert Priddy is continually and obsessively immersing himself in graphic, homosexual fantasies that involve specific homosexual acts that he imagines and visualizes to be true although they are not based in reality or on any known writings by Moreno. It would appear that Robert Priddy is obtaining some sort of deviant sexual arousal by intensely imagining and visualizing homosexual acts involving Moreno and his former Guru.

Robert Priddy’s Miscellaneous Homoerotica

Strange enough, Robert Priddy’s own son (Kai Nicolai Priddy) belonged to an industrial band from Norway that used dildos and transvestites as theatrics in their music performances (Ref). Apparently, the apple didn’t fall far from the tree.

Although Robert Priddy originally interpreted his Sai-related dreams to be blessings from the Guru, he currently argues that Sai-related dreams are the result of one’s subconcious desires and projections. Robert Priddy dreamed that Sathya Sai Baba kissed him on the mouth and drew up impurities associated with his “muladhara chakra” (Source Of The Dream by Robert Priddy; “Enigmas of Suffering and Healing”, pp. 174-175). The muladhara chakrum is the subtle “sex center” often associated with sexual energy, sexual desire and the genitals.

Therefore, using Robert Priddy’s current interpretations of Sai-related dreams, it would appear that he entertained sexual desires for his former Guru, which were projected into the dream state where his subconscious desires manifested as his former Guru kissing him on the mouth and sucking up and swallowing a substance drawn from his astral sex-center! Since Robert Priddy formerly attributed significance to this dream, his current views about Sai-related dreams has solidly situated himself between a rock and a hard place!

Robert Priddy’s Homoeroticism – In Conclusion

It is a fact that heterosexual men are not known to enjoy projecting, imagining and visualizing homosexual acts between other men (as Robert Priddy has done and continues to do). It is also a fact that heterosexual men are not known to enjoy re-writing non-sexual stories and making them into homo-erotic stories full of graphic and homosexual descriptions based on flights of imagination (as Robert Priddy has done and continues to do). Therefore, a strong argument could be made that Robert Priddy appears to be a sexually frustrated, sexually obsessed and ambiguously sexually oriented individual in need of orthodox psychosexual help.

Robert Priddy (one of the main spokespersons for the Anti-Sai Movement) embodies the perversion, deviancy and pruriency that are widely prevalent among critics of Sathya Sai Baba. Blinded by his own hate, Robert Priddy presents himself as the single most persuasive argument why one should not believe the allegations against Sathya Sai Baba. For that, Robert Priddy is to be thanked.

- UPDATE: Robert C. Priddy’s Homoerotic Genital Oilings Fascination

Robert Priddy – A Dirty Old Man

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) made the following comments on his Anti-Sai conspiracy blog about Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist):

Robert Priddy: Exactly what happened to Moreno in the private interview? The reason for my interest is not prurience but entirely as an investigator and exposer of many described crimes by Sathya Sai Baba. Joe Moreno makes a big deal about not having stated that oil was “massaged” onto his lower stomach (as I claim), saying only that it was “applied”. How then? With a spatula or a sponge? No. It was from Sai Baba’s hand, he has made that clear enough. So was it not rubbed on? (ie. = massaged in?). That way is widely reported by those describing these oil molestations. Joe is VERY cagey indeed about HOW it was applied and exactly how low down, wanting at any cost to escape any idea that he was being ‘groomed’ to see if he would rise to the approach. He says this occurs between the navel and the pubic area… but plenty of others have explained that it includes the genitals. I am not saying that Joe experienced that, but I think Sai baba did take his pants down (he does, according to reports) or told him to do in words or gestures (as other who received his attentions have described). Or did Sai Baba put his hand inside his pants to reach the lower stomach? Or what? Let Moreno explain himself. Too embarrassing to admit, perhaps, what actually was the case?

This article is an addition to two former articles:

1. Sai Baba Critic Robert Priddy Openly Falsifies Molestation Claim
2. Sai Baba Critic Robert Priddy Falsifies Information About Joe Apodaca Signature

Robert Priddy’s fascination with Moreno’s interview experience with Sathya Sai Baba is not only one of “prurience”, it is one of sexual deviancy as well.

No matter how many clarifications, details or explanations Moreno may give, Robert Priddy will never be satisfied, will never let go of his lecherous fantasies and will never let go of his “too embarrassed to talk about it” argument.

Robert Priddy is a dirty old man that can’t stop obsessing, squirming and drooling over the possibility that Sathya Sai Baba did something sexual to Moreno (he didn’t). This type of sexual perversity is best left to psychiatrists, psychosexual therapists and the DSM-IV-TR. It would appear that Robert Priddy is the type of sadist who derives some sort of perverse sexual gratification in humiliating others by projecting his libidinous fantasies onto them.

Despite Moreno’s repeated and tireless clarifications about his interview experiences with Sathya Sai Baba, Robert Priddy continues to deny, distort and falsify Moreno’s account.

Moreno first addressed the sexual abuse libels made against him on July 3rd 2006 and a second time on September 19th 2006. Moreno published a detailed article in August 2007 refuting the sexual abuse libels made against him by Sanjay Dadlani, Tony O’Clery, Basava Premanand, Conny Larsson, Reineir Van Der Sandt, Barbara Dent, UsedByBaba and Alan Kazlev.

Moreno clearly stated that Sathya Sai Baba applied materialized, fragrant and green oil in one motion of his hand just beneath his belly button (i.e., “lower stomach”, not to be confused with one’s “lower abdomen” or “pubic” region). The oil was such that it promptly disappeared in contact with the skin and left no oily residue. Hence, no “massaging” required. Moreno divulged this information several years back and Robert Priddy continues to deny that Moreno ever made such clarifications!

As a matter of fact, Moreno said:

For those who have the integrity, honesty and decency to research the facts for him/her self, let me be absolutely clear about my oiling experience with Sathya Sai Baba:

I was not sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba.

Sathya Sai Baba did not rub oil on my genitals.

At no time were my pants pulled down or my genitals exposed.

Sathya Sai Baba smeared the oil, in one movement of his hand, just below my belly button. I was not fondled, kissed, massaged or touched in any other way indicative of questionable or inappropriate sexual behavior.

Sathya Sai Baba did not “command” me to observe celibacy. He confirmed I should follow a path I had chosen but had doubts about.

The oil promptly disappeared on contact with my skin. There was no oily residue left afterwards.

The oiling was not “pleasurable”, nor did I experience euphoria or any other kind of altered state for several weeks after its application.

Although Sathya Sai Baba did not tell me what the oil was for, he materialized the oil just after telling me about a severe gastrointestinal illness I endured (from which I lost a significant amount of weight in a short period of time) and after confirming to me that I should observe celibacy. Baba knew about my question concerning celibacy and my illness although I said nothing to him or anyone else at the ashram.

These are the facts of the matter. I think my statements (which have not changed in all these years) supersede the libelous, sexually-twisted, defamatory and deceitful claims made by Ex-Devotees against me, (who go around claiming I was sexually abused and fondled when I was not). Since my oiling experience does not fit into critic’s preconceived ideas about oilings (none of the currently vocal critics ever claimed having received one), they attempt to misrepresent and twist my words with sexual inferences. This speaks volumes about ex-devotees, their lack of character, their lack of dedication to the truth and their very disturbing sexual focus/perversity on everything relating to Sathya Sai Baba.

Ex-Devotees invalidate everything I say (all the while calling me a “liar”) yet apparently believe me when I said I had an oiling. They cherry-pick their criticisms to advance their own nefarious agendas and attempt to deceive the general public by harping on sincerity, honesty, morality and ethics! If ex-devotees lie like this about me, what does this say about their claims against Sathya Sai Baba?

Reference (or View The August 27th 2007 Archive)

The facts show that Moreno did make the clarifications that Robert Priddy demanded from him (although Priddy is in no position to make any demands from Moreno). As stated before, Robert Priddy will never be satisfied with Moreno’s clarifications and will continually resort to the “he is too embarrassed to talk about it” argument.

If Robert Priddy fabricates sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other sexual molestation claims is he fabricating as well?

When Robert Priddy believes that even those who deny being sexually molested were sexually molested, then one can better understand why Moreno refers to Robert Priddy as an “extremist”, a “fanatic”, a “pathological liar” and a “mentally unstable defamer”.

However, Moreno will make a few additional clarifications for interested readers:

1. Isn’t it strange that for someone who is alleged to have been “embarrassed” about being “molested sexually”, Moreno revealed the full details of his interview experience with Sathya Sai Baba on a public website (Ref)? Surely, if Moreno was so “embarrassed” about being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba, he would not have publicly mentioned it in the first place!
2. Sathya Sai Baba did not “gesture” or say “in words” for Moreno to lower his pants as graphically fantasized by Robert Priddy. As stated numerous times before, Moreno’s pants were never (ever) pulled down, loosened or touched.
3. Sathya Sai Baba did not (at any time) “put his hand inside” Moreno’s pants as graphically fantasized by Robert Priddy.
4. Moreno did not “want at any cost to escape any idea that he was being ‘groomed’ to see if he would rise to the approach” as graphically fantasized by Robert Priddy. Since Moreno’s genitals were never exposed or touched and since Sathya Sai Baba just finished confirming to Moreno that he should observe celibacy…how was that supposed to happen?

Robert Priddy’s arguments against Moreno are indicative of the type of conspiracy mentality and extremist mindset that makes him so utterly unbelievable. Robert Priddy would have the world believe that even those who deny being sexually molested, were. Robert Priddy would also have the world believe that his shabby conspiracies, fabricated statements and screwball speculations somehow trump Moreno’s first-hand comments and explanations!

Of course, Robert Priddy is the same guy who would have the world believe that his LSD-induced experiences were not hallucinatory in nature (although LSD is a hallucinogen)! Apparently, his telepathic connection with Eric Steadman, his “out of body experience” and his vision of broken bones sticking out of flesh from a broken wrist were not hallucinatory at all!…Which brings us back to Robert Priddy’s hallucinations about Joe Moreno & Sathya Sai Baba…The stuff drugs do to people’s brains!

Second Coming Of Semantics VS Second Coming Of Jesus Christ aka Parousia aka Advent
continue reading…

Sathya Sai Baba, Erlendur Haraldsson & Robert Priddy
Fraudulent And Misleading Claims About Dr. Erlendur Haraldsson By Robert Priddy

On a couple of Anti-Sai websites, Robert Priddy said:

“Further, just as one more example, my colleague Professor Erlendur Haraldsson of Rekjavik University, who investigated the Sai movement and alleged miracles very widely in the 1970s (though without controlled scientific results), was repeatedly told of Sai Baba’s sexual interest in boys and young men and refers to some of these in his book ‘Modern Miracles’.”

The paragraph above is proof that Robert Priddy resorts to blatant exaggerations and complete misrepresentations of facts to mislead and deceive the general public.

First and foremost, Robert Priddy was never a “colleague” (as it is generally understood) of Dr. Erlendur Haraldsson. Although Priddy and Haraldsson worked at universities, they worked in different universities, in different countries, in different faculties (Priddy in Philosophy and Haraldsson in Psychology) and at different times.

“Colleague” is generally defined as:

1. A fellow member of a profession, staff, or academic faculty; an associate. See synonyms at partner. (Ref)
2. An associate in a profession or in a civil or ecclesiastical office. (Ref)

Robert Priddy and Dr. Erlendur Haraldsson were:

• Never fellow members, staff or academic faculty in the same profession.
• Never fellow members, staff or academic faculty at the same university.

Secondly, Dr. Erlendur Haraldsson was not at the Reykjavik University. He was at the University of Iceland (an important fact that a close “colleague” would not get incorrect).

Lastly, Dr. Erlendur Haraldsson was not “repeatedly told of Sai Baba’s sexual interest in boys and young men” and did not “refer to some of these stories in his book ‘Modern Miracles’”. These claims are bold-faced and gutter untruths.

Erlendur Haraldsson only made one reference to “homosexuality” in his book Modern Miracles in the chapter entitled “The Critics”. The sentence in question said: “One letter accused him of homosexuality.” That’s it!

It is also significant that Dr. Narasimhaiah (a critic of Sai Baba) said the following about the letters he received (among which was the letter alleging homosexuality):

“Dr. Narasimhaiah: ‘I don’t think we can find anything substantial there, otherwise I would certainly have used that material (against Sai Baba).’ According to Dr. Narasimhaiah, there was nothing in the letters indicating fraud by Baba.”

Therefore, the letter alleging homosexuality was dismissed by Narasimhaiah as unsubstantial and unsubstaniated. No where in Haraldsson’s book did he talk about allegations (nor did he relate stories) pertaining to sexual abuse or sexual interest in “boys and young men” against Sathya Sai Baba.

Robert Priddy should immediately retract these fraudulent and incorrect claims from Anti-Sai websites and issue a public apology (as he and other critics can be seen demanding of others).

More Deceptive And Misleading Claims About Dr. Erlendur Haraldsson By Robert Priddy
On Robert Priddy’s Anti-Sai WordPress blog (which contains numerous defamations, libels and slurs against Sathya Sai Baba, Sai Devotees and Sai Proponents), he made highly misleading statements about Dr. Erlendur Haraldsson when he said:

“Professor Erlendur Haraldsson, who my wife and I have known since 1989 and who still visits us, has still not been able to get any evidence of endless vibuthi supplies, despite decades of interest in the matter.”

Although Robert Priddy continually attempts to use Professor Erlendur Haraldsson’s name to push Anti-Sai Material, Erlendur Haraldsson is not Anti-Sai Baba (as confirmed in private email correspondence with Joe Moreno).

Professor Erlendur Haraldsson first met Robert & Reidun Priddy in 1989 at Puttaparthi when Robert & Reidun were both Sai Devotees. Erlendur Haraldsson visits Oslo every two or three years and has met Robert & Reidun Priddy 3-4 times for an hour or two (mostly in restaurants). Erlendur Haraldsson also visits Sai Devotees when he visits Denmark. These visits are not indicative of a Pro-Sai or Anti-Sai position because the people in question are simply friends.

Dr Erlendur Haraldsson personally told Joe Moreno (in a private email correspondence) that Robert Priddy’s statement that he has been unable to obtain any evidence of endless vibuthi supplies was “a bit odd” because he “had a lot of anecdotal evidence but was not able to test the reality of the vibuthi phenomena under controlled conditions” (which he stated in his book).

Consequently, Robert Priddy’s references to Erlendur Haraldsson in his Anti-Sai writings and on his Anti-Sai blog are misleading and deceptive because Erlendur Haraldsson has not given permission to Robert Priddy to use his name to push Anti-Sai material.

Relevant Links:

• - Dr. Erlendur Haraldsson’s Home Page
• - Erlendur Haraldsson On Wikipedia
• - BOOK: Dr. Erlendur Haraldsson – “Modern Miracles: An Investigative Report on Psychic Phenomena Associated with Sathya Sai Baba. Hastings House, Mamaroneck NY, 1997” (Also on Amazon)