Satya Sai Baba Archives

Barry Pittard’s Queer Obsession With Allegations Of A Sexual Nature

Barry Pittard (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) constantly immerses himself in allegations of sexual abuse (almost on a daily and/or weekly basis as evidenced on his Anti-Baba blog) like a sexual deviant who has nothing better to do with his time.

Barry Pittard is so thoroughly obsessed with allegations of sexual molestation, he intensely meditates and visualizes those acts with such intensity, he actually praised and eulogized Robert Priddy‘s sexual molestation libels against Gerald Joe Moreno. If Barry Pittard has the audacity to endorse fabricated sexual abuse allegations against Gerald Joe Moreno, what other fraudulent sexual molestation accusations are he endorsing as well?

Barry Pittard never (ever) witnessed a single incident of alleged abuse by Sathya Sai Baba. Nor was Barry Pittard ever sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba. Therefore, why does Barry Pittard appoint himself as a proxy defender of alleged victims? Are alleged victims incompetent? Are alleged victim’s mothers and fathers incompetent as well? Not even one alleged victim and not even one alleged victim’s mother or father has even tried to file a basic police complaint or court case against Sathya Sai Baba in India. Why then is Barry Pittard making such a fuss if not to delude, deceive and mislead? Barry Pittard’s prurient, queer and fetish-like obsession with allegations of sexual abuse should raise a red flag about his character.

Needless to say, Barry Pittard has a long and established history of distortions, lies, defamations and libels.

• Barry Pittard is a laughable pervert who had the audacity to endorse Robert Priddy’s fabricated sexual molestation claims against Gerald Joe Moreno.
• Barry Pittard is a questionable individual who has been accused of inappropriately touching women and girls under the pretext of spiritual healings (which is perhaps how he fathered his son with a 21-year old girl when he was old enough to be her grandfather!).
• Barry Pittard is an Anti-Baba fanatic who attempted to incite Islamic terrorists against Sathya Sai Baba, Sai Devotees and Jews.
• Barry Pittard has so much contempt for his son Sai Isa (who bears Sathya Sai Baba’s name), Barry Pittard published his very first public picture with Sai Isa sitting on his lap!
• Barry Pittard is a Pseudo-Moralist Clown who loves to attack others for making composite images while endorsing and publishing composite images himself!
• Despite Barry Pittard’s ceaseless blathering about Sathya Sai Baba being a ‘fraud’, Barry Pittard still believes (to this day and after his defection) that Sathya Sai Baba possesses genuine paranormal powers.
• Barry Pittard has revealed himself to be a an internet bully, hypocrite and online/offline stalker who is so obsessed with Sathya Sai Baba, he actually writes songs trashing and bashing the Guru although he alleges he never ‘slurs’ (Ref)!
• Barry Pittard even accused Alaya Rahm’s lawyer of incompetence although the anonymous ‘international lawyers from three countries’ (with which Pittard claims intimate association) couldn’t help Alaya Rahm one bit with his legal case!
• Barry Pittard purposely and knowingly leaves out relevant information regarding Alaya Rahm and the Secret Swami documentary because this information would severely compromise his views and arguments against Sathya Sai Baba.
• Barry Pittard blatantly lied about there being over a hundred sworn affidavits against Sathya Sai Baba filed with the FBI.
• Barry Pittard blatantly lied about the US State Department naming Sathya Sai Baba ‘re pedophile allegations’.
• Barry Pittard is notorious for taking off-topic articles and attempting to associate them with Sathya Sai Baba as he did with his Pamela Stephenson article, his article on Susan Boyle, his misleading article about a Judge’s ruling on a pervert and misleading article about Tim Sullivan.
• The list goes on and on.

Of course, none of these things are surprising considering that Barry Pittard is allied with Bisexual & Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson and Child Porn Purveyor RFJ Sandt, Pathological Liar Robert Priddy and Perverted Fetishist Sanjay Dadlani. Barry Pittard is also a staunch promoter of New Age Advocate & Reincarnator Alan Kazlev and Guru & UFO Promoter Timothy Conway (who actually believes that Sathya Sai Baba may have molested alleged victims like aliens are alleged to do through abductions!).

The only people guilty of running “massive disinformation and cover-up campaigns” are Barry Pittard and Ex-Devotees who have attacked hundreds of Sai Devotees & Non-Devotees alike and who have created hundreds of webpages to defame, libel and smear Gerald Joe Moreno. What more can one do but laugh at loud at Barry Pittard and his hypocritical finger-pointing?

Robert Priddy’s Queer Obsession With Allegations Of A Sexual Nature

Homoerotic Fantasizer Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) constantly immerses himself in allegations of sexual abuse (almost on a daily basis as evidenced on his Anti-Baba blogs and websites) like a sexual deviant who has nothing better to do with his time.

Robert Priddy is so thoroughly obsessed with allegations of sexual molestation, he intensely meditates and visualizes those acts with such intensity, he actually falsified sexual molestation accusations against Gerald Joe Moreno. If Robert Priddy has the audacity to fabricate sexual abuse allegations against Gerald Joe Moreno, what other sexual molestation accusations are he falsifying as well?

Robert Priddy never (ever) witnessed a single incident of alleged abuse by Sathya Sai Baba. Nor was Robert Priddy ever sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba. Therefore, why does Robert Priddy appoint himself as a proxy defender of alleged victims? Are alleged victims incompetent? Are alleged victim’s mothers and fathers incompetent as well? Not even one alleged victim and not even one alleged victim’s mother or father has even tried to file a basic police complaint or court case against Sathya Sai Baba in India. Why then is Robert Priddy making such a fuss if not to delude, deceive and mislead? Robert Priddy’s prurient, queer and fetish-like obsession with allegations of sexual abuse should raise a red flag about his character.

Even more disturbing is how Robert Priddy claimed to possess telepathy without the aid of LSD and claimed to possess telepathy with the aid of LSD! This is the same man who wants us to believe his hateful and bitter accusations against Sathya Sai Baba!

Needless to say, LSD advocate Robert Priddy has a long and established history of distortions, lies, defamations and libels.

• Robert C. Priddy is a laughable pervert who had the audacity to fabricate sexual molestation claims against Gerald Joe Moreno.
• Robert C. Priddy is a laughable con-artist who published fraudulent screencaps against Gerald Joe Moreno and adamantly refuses to vindicate his claims by publishing full screencaps to Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain.
• Robert C. Priddy is a laughable stooge who attributed his own computer’s IP to Gerald Joe Moreno.
• Robert C. Priddy is in perpetual denial and publicly defends his laughable SheilaWaring Lie even though other critics have distanced themselves from that controversy.
• Robert Priddy is a laughable LSD Advocate who even cited a Pro-Drug Forum intended for Drug Users to defend his LSD-induced hallucinations.
• Robert Priddy is a malicious defamer who was sent packing with his tail between his legs when Leo Rebello Threatened Him With A $1,000,000 Lawsuit For Defamation.
• Senile Robert Priddy stated that Moreno claimed he was sexually abused under his Joe Apodaca SaiPetition.net Submission even though Moreno never made such a claim.
• Robert Priddy is a Pseudo-Moralist Clown who loves to attack others for composite images while endorsing and publishing composite images himself!
• Robert Priddy delusionally claimed that Sathya Sai Baba Personally Invited Him To India.
• Robert Priddy formerly Worshipped & Kissed Sathya Sai Baba’s feet.
• Robert Priddy Maliciously Lied About Joy Thomas and refuses to retract his bold-faced lies.
• Robert Priddy claimed he had a Telepathic Connection To Sathya Sai Baba.
• Robert Priddy documented a Homoerotic Dream With His Former Guru that involved the guru sucking up and swallowing a substance associated with his sex chakra!
• The list goes on and on.

Of course, none of these things are surprising considering that Robert Priddy is an LSD Advocate who is thoroughly obsessed with genital oilings and who relishes projecting his homoerotic fantasies onto Moreno. Robert Priddy is allied with Bisexual & Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson and Child Porn Purveyor RFJ Sandt and Perverted Fetishist Sanjay Dadlani. Robert Priddy is also a staunch promoter of New Age Advocate & Reincarnator Alan Kazlev and Guru & UFO Promoter Timothy Conway (who actually believes that Sathya Sai Baba may have molested alleged victims like aliens are alleged to do through abductions!).

The only people guilty of running “massive disinformation and cover-up campaigns” are Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees who have attacked hundreds of Sai Devotees & Non-Devotees alike and who have created hundreds of webpages to defame, libel and smear Gerald Joe Moreno. What more can one do but laugh at loud at Robert Priddy and his hypocritical finger-pointing?

Refuting The Allegations Against Sathya Sai Baba With Factual Information:
Many people have not properly educated themselves regarding the facts pertaining to the Sathya Sai Baba Controversy and the alleged ‘Sai Baba Sex Scandal’. This article was created out of the necessity to provide the general public with factual and verifiable information about the many online smear & hate campaigns waged against Sathya Sai Baba by Ex-Devotees.

WordPress Blogs Used As A Tool For Anti-Sai Propaganda:
Robert Priddy, Barry Pittard, RFJ Sandt, Sanjay Dadlani and Brian Steel have resorted to obsessive, repetitive and almost daily smear campaigns against Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba, Sai Devotees and Sai Proponents through hundreds of webpages, websites, forums, blogs, free-press-release websites and their own WordPress blogs (Ref):

robertpriddy.wordpress.com
robertcpriddy.wordpress.com
sathyasaibabanews.wordpress.com
barrypittard.wordpress.com
briansteel.wordpress.com
brianestil.wordpress.com
exbabablog.wordpress.com
saibabaexposed.wordpress.com

These WordPress blogs contain articles and links that defame, ridicule and libel Sathya Sai Baba, Sai Devotees and Sai Proponents in the most vile, derogatory and malicious ways. Even Netscape and Digg banned Robert Priddy, Barry Pittard, Brian Steel and various other Ex-Devotees for their spam-like solicitation of Priddy & Pittard’s defamatory WordPress blogs (Refs: 01 – 02 – 03 – 04). It is also important to know that Priddy, Pittard, van der Sandt, Dadlani and Steel were never sexually abused and never witnessed an incident of alleged abuse.

It is also a fact that Barry Pittard was threatened with legal action by Ramanathan and Robert Priddy was threatened with a million dollar legal claim for defamation by Leo Rebello (Ref). Anti-Sai Activists were threatened with a highly secretive legal suit (whose particulars they refuse to divulge) that forced them to put disclaimers on their Anti-Sai websites that state the information they provide against Sri Sathya Sai Baba may NOT be true, accurate or valid (Ref)! Robert Priddy was legally challenged and lost his saibaba.org.uk domain, which fraudulently attempted to impersonate an Official Sathya Sai Organisation domain in the UK.

Countering The Allegations With Factual Information:
Many Sai Devotees do not believe the allegations against Sathya Sai Baba based on rational, reasonable, intellectual, factual and common sense observations. No need to resort to “divinity” claims or “true believer” claims. Some of these rational, reasonable, intellectual, factual and common-sense observations are:

• Alleged victims have never (ever) filed a basic police complaint against Sathya Sai Baba in India for alleged improprieties (Ref).

• Alleged victims have never (ever) filed a court case against Sathya Sai Baba in India for alleged improprieties (Ref).

• Sathya Sai Baba has never (ever) been formally charged with any crime, sexual or otherwise (Ref).

• Alleged victim’s contradictory stories, questionable claims, revealing personal comments and internet behavior strongly argue that they are not credible (Refs: 01 – 02).

• Although it is claimed that alleged victims filed “affidavits” and were willing to testify in a court of law in India against Sai Baba (Ref), they have never been able to obtain the representation of a lawyer despite:
  • The lucrative prospect of a successful suit (critics allege that Sathya Sai Baba’s “empire” is worth over a billion dollars).
  • The offer of free “world-class legal resources” from Ex-Devotees (Ref).
  • Ex-Devotees constant claims that they are in correspondence with “international lawyers” and “top lawyers” from three countries.
  • The opportunity (whether the lawsuit is successful or not) to present to the world the alleged “evidence” they claim they possess (but are withholding for reasons of secrecy and confidentiality).
  • The vast publicity a lawsuit against Sathya Sai Baba would generate to their cause.

• Ex-Devotees have alleged that “hundreds” to “thousands” of “minors”, “children” and “male youth” have been molested by Sathya Sai Baba. Needless to say, all of the alleged victims (including their mothers and fathers) have all (without exception) failed in their legal duty of “mandated reporting” and are thereby (using critic’s arguments) “accomplices in sexual molestation crimes”. When no one (including mothers, fathers and/or relatives) has filed a basic police complaint, public grievance or court case against Sathya Sai Baba in India for the alleged molestations of “children”, why should Sai Devotees make complaints or launch investigations based on internet rumors spread by people who have proven themselves (time and again) to be pathological prevaricators? These indisputable facts strongly solidify the argument that Sathya Sai Baba never molested children (Ref).

• Several alleged victims dubiously claimed that Sathya Sai Baba literally and miraculously transformed his penis into a vagina (and vice-versa) by snapping his fingers, clapping his hands or blowing on his fingertips (Ref).

• Alleged victim’s stories and accounts are mostly repeated, clarified, explained, changed, furthered and argued by non-victims who were never abused themselves and who never witnessed an incident of alleged abuse themselves. Even going back to 2001, Anti-Sai sympathizers rightly questioned the hearsay allegations against Sai Baba (Ref).

• Some of the most vocal voices in the Anti-Sai Movement (i.e., Robert Priddy, Barry Pittard, Sanjay Dadlani, Tony O’Clery, Conny Larsson and R.F.J. Sandt) have obsessively resorted to deceit, gutter tactics, defamations, blatant misrepresentation of facts, hostility and outright prevarication. This type of shocking and very disturbing behavior has effectively negated critic’s self-professed and alleged credibility.

• All of the negative media against Sai Baba was the result of critic’s behind-the-scenes subterfuge, unremitting propaganda and “e-bombing campaigns”. Critics even boasted on Anti-Sai websites how they were responsible for and involved with various negative media exposures against Sai Baba. This holds true for The Secret Swami, The Divine Downfall Interview, The Seduced Program, The Unesco Withdrawal, The U.S. State Dept. Warning, The Guardian Article By Paul Lewis, Michelle Goldberg’s Salon.com Article, India Today, NineMSN Channel 9, etc., etc., etc.

• Anti-Sai Activists have waged extensive and unremitting smear campaigns on the internet through hundreds of websites and on thousands of webpages (Ref), created a bogus Global Coalition and created a fraudulent Sai Petition to further their hateful objectives. Critics have grouped together to control and bias the Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia article (Ref) and have attacked hundreds of Sai Devotees and Non-Devotees alike.

• The Anti-Sai Movement is an extremist hate group that continually attempts to incite anger, hatred and malice against Sathya Sai Baba. Barry Pittard (one of the main spokespersons for the Anti-Sai movement) attempted to incite Islamic Terrorists to slaughter Jews and foreigners at Sathya Sai Baba’s ashrams in Puttaparthi and Whitefield (Ref). Ex-Devotees (particulary Barry Pittard, Reinier Van Der Sandt, Barbara Dent and Tal Brooke) have openly boasted about their attempts (and successes) to polarize Christians against Sathya Sai Baba (Ref). The anonymous SaiBaba-Invigilator blog speciously claimed that Sathya Sai Baba promotes “Tantric Corpse Eating” (Ref). Sanjay Dadlani (under the pseudonym “kick his head in”) said that someone should murder Sathya Sai Baba (Ref) and even rejoiced when a Sai Baba temple was bombed by a terrorist (Refs: 01 – 02). Kevin Shepherd (a critic who has never seen and was never devoted to Sai Baba) spuriously alleged that Sathya Sai Baba is allied with terrorists. The rationalist Indian Skeptic magazine published a fake picture of Sathya Sai Baba holding hands with Idi Amin and attempted to pass it off as an original picture (Ref). Basava Premanand claimed that the “Sathya Sai Baba Gang” murdered over a hundred people, including Mr. Venkatamuni (since proven a bold-faced lie). These are just a few examples (out of scores) that reveal the true modus operandi of critics and ex-devotees that wholly negates their so-called “credibility” and “integrity”.

• Several critics of Sai Baba (i.e., Robert Priddy, Sanjay Dadlani, Tony O’Clery, UsedByBaba, Barbara Dent and R.F.J. Sandt) have used numerous incognito internet names, attempting to pass themselves off as various individuals, including Pro-Sai activists. This type of fully documented and very disturbing online behavior (Refs: 01 – 02) strongly argues that many of the allegations against Sai Baba may be entirely fabricated by mentally unsound people whose primary goal is to deceive.

• Critics have ridiculously asserted (with no proof whatsoever) that Sathya Sai Baba is a “pedophile” who runs elite pedophile and human trafficking rings by shipping Negros to India from New York’s ghettos for sexual purposes (Ref). Despite these absurd and outlandish allegations, Sathya Sai Baba and the Sai Organization have never (ever) been charged or implicated with any pedophile rings or people trafficking rings (either directly, indirectly or otherwise). Nor have any reputable media agencies or independent journalists been able to confirm even one single instance of alleged pedophilia and/or human trafficking related to Sai Baba or the Sai Organisation.

• The widely dispersed core allegations against Sathya Sai Baba can be directly traced to Conny Larsson, a vocal critic and founding member to the Anti-Sai Movement. Shortly after his defection from Sathya Sai Baba in 1999, Conny Larsson developed from a vocal ex-devotee to an “internationally renowned” self-proclaimed prophet and psychic trance medium for the spirit of Maharshi Vyasa. During Conny Larsson’s metamorphosis into a psychic channeler and spirit medium, Ex-Devotees have purposely suppressed and avoided any and all discussion about Conny Larsson’s psychic claims and obviously fear the repercussions that one of the founding members to the Anti-Sai Movement would be perceived to be a loon, charlatan and possible schizophrenic (as Conny self-disclosed his psychiatric diagnosis made by a psychiatrist of him being “psychoinfantile”, which is also known as Histrionic Personality Disorder). Moreno has argued that Conny Larsson’s self-disclosed history of his life-time involvement with psychiatrists, psychotherapists and deprogrammers might explain why he now claims to hear “spirit voices” in his head and claims to see and communicate with dead people and dead animals (Ref).

• The widely dispersed core allegations against Sathya Sai Baba can be directly traced to Tal Brooke, a fundamentalist and evangelical Christian who believes that all Gurus are in a state of perfect demon possession and that all Eastern Philosophies, New Age Beliefs and Hindu Beliefs are evil paths leading to Satan. What does this say about the integrity and objectivity of Tal Brooke’s claims against Sathya Sai Baba? 99% of the allegations against Sai Baba are linked (in one way or another) to Tal Brooke and his religiously-fueled propaganda, which he solicits to this day with expensive Google advertisements soliciting his Anti-Baba book.

• Former Followers have a nasty habit of sexualizing everything pertaining to Sathya Sai Baba and Sai Proponents. This deviant and perverse sexualization of Sai Baba is a highly prevalent tactic employed by former followers (Ref), even with absurd claims that Sai Baba is engaging in questionable sexual acts in full view of thousands of devotees while being recorded on video. For example, see the edited Ex-Baba movie clip entitled Sai Baba Groin (approximately 950kb, wmv file). Robert Priddy (one of the main spokespersons for the Anti-Sai movement) attempted to portray Sathya Sai Baba as a homosexual and transvestite (Ref). Ex-Devotees have also maliciously accused Joe Moreno of being sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba despite his many repeated clarifications to the contrary (Ref). Robert Priddy has openly falsified sexual molestation claims against Moreno (Refs: 01 – 02 – 03 – 04 – 05). Moreno has also been targeted by critics and hundreds of webpages have been created to defame and libel him (Ref). Ex-Devotees have even resorted to screencap fraud against Moreno. This type of blatant dishonesty strongly suggests that critics are not as truthful, sincere or compassionate as they claim to be.

The Secret Agenda Of The ‘Secret Swami’:
Alaya Rahm, one of the prime ‘witnesses’ who alleged sexual impropriety against Sai Baba, self-dismissed his bogus lawsuits against Sathya Sai Baba, Dr. Michael Goldstein and the American Sathya Sai Baba Society (Ref) on the advice of his lawyer and after a damaging video-taped deposition was obtained from Lewis Kreydick (a ‘witness’ cited by Alaya Rahm himself). Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist) provided a scanned index to all relevant court records on his Pro-Sai website, saisathyasai.com.

In “Response To Form Interrogatories” in Alaya Rahm’s self-dismissed lawsuit against the Sathya Sai Baba Society (Form Interrogatory No. 6.3, Set One) Alaya Rahm fully admitted that he had been a daily user of illegal street drugs and alcohol from 1995 – 2005. Consequently, during Alaya Rahm’s “Divine Downfall” and India Today Anti-Sai interviews and during the filming of the BBC Documentary “Secret Swami” and the “Seduced By Sai Baba” Danish Documentary, Alaya Rahm was under the influence of illegal street drugs and alcohol while relating his alleged sexual encounters with Sathya Sai Baba. This crucial information wholly undermines Alaya Rahm’s credibility and irreparably compromises the integrity of his claims. Needless to say, Alaya Rahm’s alcoholism and drug addiction have been purposely suppressed from the general public by Anti-Sai Activists, the Rahm Family and the media (Ref).

Critic’s responded to Alaya Rahm’s failed lawsuit by wholly misrepresenting the facts (Ref) and heavily cited an alleged and secretive letter written by Attorney William Brelsford (Alaya Rahm’s pro-bono lawyer). Then critics flip-flopped and accused Attorney William Brelsford of incompetence (Ref) even though they adamantly refuse to remove his “seriously deficient” comments from their Anti-Sai websites.

These are verifiable facts about the Sai Baba Debate & Online Controversy and despite the alleged ‘Sai Baba Sex Scandal’, the absurd allegations of ‘Elite Pedophile Rings’, the absurd allegations of ‘Human Trafficking Rings’, claims of ‘Murder’, claims of ‘International Racketeering’, claims of being affiliated with ‘Terrorists’ and ‘Terrorism’, accusations of bribery, allegations of ‘Serial Sexual Abuse’, claims of fraud, fakery and deceit, etc. (the list of gutter accusations goes on and on), Sathya Sai Baba and the Sai Organization have never (ever) been charged with any crime.

Ex-Devotees and critics are desperate to smear Sathya Sai Baba and their numerous libels, defamations and shocking online behavior are recorded on the internet as testaments to this fact.

Important Related Links:
- Alaya Rahm Self-Dismissed His Own Lawsuit Against The SSB Society
- Alaya Rahm – A Decade-Long Daily User Of Illegal Street Drugs And Alcohol
- A Scathing Response To Critics About Alaya Rahm’s Failed Lawsuit
- The Truth About The ‘Secret Swami’ Program
- The ‘Open Letter’ To The Prashanti Council – Defamations Addressed
- Prof. Venkataraman Writes About The Sai Controversy
- Bryan Ronald Wilson (Emeritus Professor) Describes The Apostate Syndrome

For further information, please feel free to contact Gerald Joe Moreno.

Alleged Sexual Molestation Victim Of Sai Baba Comes Forward With A Shocking Revelation

Ex-Devotee’s of Sathya Sai Baba, (particularly Robert Priddy, Barry Pittard, Brian Steel, Conny Larsson, Timothy Conway, Alan Kazlez and Sanjay Dadlani) are in complete denial about the allegations against Sathya Sai Baba and continue to babble incessently about “sexual abuse” despite the fact that no one has yet to file a basic police complaint, court case or public grievance in India against Sathya Sai Baba. Despite these irrefutable facts Ex-Devotees continually demand legal investigations be made against the Sathya Sai Organization although no legal complaints have ever been filed against the Sathya Sai Organization by any alleged “victim” or by any alleged “victim’s” mother or father!

Ex-Devotees laughable and ridiculous legal demands are akin to accusing a person of theft based on internet complaints, demanding that the thief be punished although there are no basic police complaints or court cases alleging theft! If anyone should have legal investigations brought against them, the legal investigations should be brought against the mothers and fathers of alleged victims who have all (without exception) ignored and dismissed the alleged molestations of their children! When parents have not sought legal action against the Sathya Sai Organization, who do Ex-Devotee’s think they are to be demanding legal action?

Alleged ‘Sexual Molestation’ Victim Claims He Was NOT Molested!

Robert C. Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) is a pathological liar of the worst order who cannot be trusted to tell the truth. The same holds true for Ex-Devotees who adamantly refuse to disassociate themselves from Robert Priddy’s malicious defamation campaigns. Robert Priddy has openly libeled Gerald Joe Moreno as being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba.

Gerald Joe Moreno (one of the alleged and so-called “sexual molestation victims” of Sathya Sai Baba) has courageously come forward and PUBLICLY DENIED that he was “molested sexually” by the Guru. At no time did Moreno ever imply or suggest that he was “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba. When Ex-Devotees lie about and libel Gerald Moreno as being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba, what does this say about Ex-Devotee”s self-professed “integrity” and “crediblity”? Ex-Devotees are obviously a small and vocal group of fanatics in pathological denial who thrive on self-imagined, self-created and homoerotic conspiracy theories not rooted in fact.

The Failed Court Case Against The Sathya Sai Baba Society Of America

It is amusing to note that Robert Priddy said the following on his Anti-Baba blog:

Robert Priddy: If such a trial were to occur, the full facts and testimonials – and affidavits which are still held – would come to light, and witnesses claiming they were abused by him could then stand forth under foreign ambassadorial protection. Of course, he would have to try to prosecute those who testified against him in their own countries, which would give him and his organization media coverage they evidently cannot risk and also considerable legal difficulties.

Needless to say, such a trail was set to go to court in California in the USA via Alaya Rahm vs the Sathya Sai Baba Society of America. The end result?

• Alaya Rahm self dismissed his own lawsuit with prejudice.
• Not even one alleged victim was named as a witness on behalf of Alaya Rahm.
• Not even one deposition was taken on behalf of Alaya Rahm.
• Not even one “affidavit” was submitted into evidence on behalf of Alaya Rahm.
• Not even one “testimonial” was submitted into evidence on behalf of Alaya Rham.

In “Response To Form Interrogatories” in Alaya Rahm’s self-dismissed lawsuit against the Sathya Sai Baba Society (Form Interrogatory No. 6.3, Set One) Alaya Rahm fully admitted that he had been a daily user of illegal street drugs and alcohol from 1995 – 2005. Consequently, during Alaya Rahm’s “Divine Downfall” and India Today Anti-Sai interviews and during the filming of the BBC Documentary “Secret Swami” and the “Seduced By Sai Baba” Danish Documentary, Alaya Rahm was under the influence of illegal street drugs and alcohol while relating his alleged sexual encounters with Sathya Sai Baba. This crucial information wholly undermines Alaya Rahm’s credibility and irreparably compromises the integrity of his claims. Needless to say, Alaya Rahm’s alcoholism and drug addiction have been purposely suppressed from the general public by Anti-Sai Activists, the Rahm Family and the media (Ref).

Supporting Alaya Rahm’s involvement with illegal street drugs and drug addicts is a secondary court case in November 2007 where Alaya Rahm testified on behalf of his friend Valdez T Woods who was arrested and convicted for possession of crack cocaine and marijuana with the intent to deliver (PDF Reference). As a matter of fact, Valdez T Woods was arrested within a mile of Alaya Rahm’s then current residence (as revealed in official court records). Alaya Rahm was identified as a “friend and associate” of drug dealer and drug addict Valdez T Woods.

These are irrefutable facts supported by official court records. Robert Priddy, on the other hand, cannot source his arguments to any official court records or to any legal documentation whatsoever. Robert C. Priddy not only acts as a proxy spokesperson for alleged victims, he also acts as a “proxy guardian” because alleged victim’s mothers and fathers have all (without exception) failed in their moral, ethical and legal duties by ignoring the alleged molestations of their children. The reason why Robert C. Priddy does not shut up is because if he did, the silence would be deafening because no one else besides critics are making all the fuss.

Robert C. Priddy and Ex-Devotees need to shut up and let the alleged victims and their mothers and fathers talk for themselves. The fact that alleged victims and their mothers and fathers are not talking strongly suggests that Sathya Sai Baba did nothing wrong. Robert C. Priddy and Ex-Devotees should take their gripes to the parents of alleged victims and should be castigating them for ignoring their children’s alleged molestations.

Concluding Statement: Robert Priddy The Con Artist

Needless to say, LSD advocate Robert Priddy has a long and established history of distortions, lies, defamations and libels.

• Robert C. Priddy is a laughable pervert who had the audacity to fabricate sexual molestation claims against Gerald Joe Moreno.
• Robert C. Priddy is a laughable con-artist who published fraudulent screencaps against Gerald Joe Moreno and adamantly refuses to vindicate his claims by publishing full screencaps to Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain.
• Robert C. Priddy is a laughable stooge who attributed his own computer’s IP to Gerald Joe Moreno.
• Robert C. Priddy is in perpetual denial and publicly defends his laughable SheilaWaring Lie even though other critics have distanced themselves from that controversy.
• Robert Priddy is a laughable LSD Advocate who even cited a Pro-Drug Forum intended for Drug Users to defend his LSD-induced hallucinations.
• Robert Priddy is a malicious defamer who was sent packing with his tail between his legs when Leo Rebello Threatened Him With A $1,000,000 Lawsuit For Defamation.
• Senile Robert Priddy stated that Moreno claimed he was sexually abused under his Joe Apodaca SaiPetition.net Submission even though Moreno never made such a claim.
• Robert Priddy is a Pseudo-Moralist Clown who loves to attack others for composite images while endorsing and publishing composite images himself!
• Robert Priddy delusionally claimed that Sathya Sai Baba Personally Invited Him To India.
• Robert Priddy formerly Worshipped & Kissed Sathya Sai Baba’s feet.
• Robert Priddy Maliciously Lied About Joy Thomas and refuses to retract his bold-faced lies.
• Robert Priddy claimed he had a Telepathic Connection To Sathya Sai Baba.
• Robert Priddy documented a Homoerotic Dream With His Former Guru that involved the guru sucking up and swallowing a substance associated with his sex chakra!
• The list goes on and on.

Of course, none of these things are surprising considering that Robert Priddy is an LSD Advocate who is thoroughly obsessed with genital oilings and who relishes projecting his homoerotic fantasies onto Moreno. Robert Priddy is allied with Bisexual & Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson and Child Porn Purveyor RFJ Sandt and Perverted Fetishist Sanjay Dadlani. Robert Priddy is also a staunch promoter of New Age Advocate & Reincarnator Alan Kazlev and Guru & UFO Promoter Timothy Conway (who actually believes that Sathya Sai Baba may have molested alleged victims like aliens are alleged to do through abductions!).

The only people guilty of running “massive disinformation and cover-up campaigns” are Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees who have attacked hundreds of Sai Devotees & Non-Devotees alike and who have created hundreds of webpages to defame, libel and smear Gerald Joe Moreno. What more can one do but laugh at loud at Robert Priddy and his hypocritical finger-pointing?

Hislop Letters, Robert Priddy & PhD Timothy Conway

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic, defamer and libeler of Sathya Sai Baba and others) has written about the so-called Hislop Letters on his Anti-Baba wordpress blog and referenced PhD Timothy Conway.

Although Robert Priddy can often be seen trashing and bashing Guru promoters, New Age advocates and superstitionists, he hypocritically and self-righteously cited PhD Timothy Conway (a Guru promoter, New Age advocate and superstitionist) as an authority regarding the alleged Hislop Letters (to which no original copies are in existence).

Timothy Conway PhD – The True Believer

Although PhD Timothy Conway can often be seen attempting to present himself as a rational and logical voice against Sathya Sai Baba, he is a true believer and promoter of Gurus [3], Mystics [3], Enlightened Masters [3], psychics [1] [2] [4], levitation [5], bi-location [5], miracles [5], remote-viewing [4], elementals, meditation [2] [6], paranormal powers [5], aliens [4] [10], rebirth [1] [7], reincarnation [1] [7], karma [8], oracles [2], I-Ching [2], sensitives [1] [2], channelers [1] [2], astrology [2], astrologists [2], palm-reading [2], non-duality [9], etc. (the list goes on and on).

For example, if you are looking for an answer to a difficult problem, Timothy Conway PhD suggested the following solutions:

PhD Timothy Conway: “Ask God (Spirit, the one God-Self) for guidance and for some kind of ‘omen’ or ‘sign,’ if needed, to proceed in a certain direction (i.e., making choice A, B, C or whatever). Be willing to wait several days or weeks (or, in some cases, months or even years for this guidance to manifest)…Use an oracle, such as the I Ching (Book of Changes). More simply, you can ask for Divine Guidance and then flip a coin–with heads meaning one choice, tails meaning the other choice. If you like, flip it 10 times and see if a clear pattern emerges. You might say, ‘Well, how the coin flips is simply due to chance.’ Perhaps. But one can also trust that there is a deeper Principle behind everything that happens, and you can ask this Divine Guiding Intelligence to show you an answer via the coin-tossing process. Alternatively, you can create a slightly more sophisticated oracle of your own by getting out 3 or 4 pieces of paper. Then write ‘yes’ on one, ‘no’ on another, ‘wait’ on a third piece of paper, and, if you like, ‘wrong question’ on the fourth piece of paper. Then turn them face down, scramble them up, and pick one of the 3 or 4 pieces of paper to get guidance this way…You can also consult a psychic ‘sensitive’ and/or an astrologer or a palmist (Indian jyotish astrology followed by Western astrology seem to be the most accurate astrology systems. And, curiously, palmistry and astrology seem to complement each other as different methods for getting to the same ‘karmic’ information on the soul’s mission, destiny, strengths and vulnerabilities).” (Reference)

Perhaps Robert Priddy & Timothy Conway sit around flipping coins, tossing papers, consulting the I Ching, consulting Astrologer Kai Nicolai Priddy (Robert Priddy’s son) or consulting Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson to formulate their opinions about Sathya Sai Baba?

Timothy Conway – A UFO Conspiracist

Timothy Conway also believed and endorsed (Ref) the alleged experiences of Shirlи Klein-Carsh, a so-called “Indigo” (an alleged extraterrestrial alien that voluntarily incarnates on Earth). Shirlи Klein-Carsh claimed she was psychologically, spiritually and artistically guided by a cleverly disguised alien from Sirius (the star in the constellation of Canis Major) who worked as an electronics repairman in a second-hand shop. Timothy Conway said:

PhD Timothy Conway: “This is a fascinating study of someone with sensitivities hardly dreamed of by most persons. Other books present the carefully presented and reasoned case for the existence of inter-dimensional aliens interacting with humans. This book goes straight into the mystery and wonder of the human-alien contact.” – Timothy Conway, PhD., author of ‘Women of Power and Grace’

Furthering his alien and UFO beliefs, Timothy Conway attempted to argue that if Sai Baba possesses paranormal powers, he could easily “warp spacetime” by creating an “insular interdimensional environment” where he could engage in abuse without easy detection. Attempting to bolster this asinine argument, Timothy Conway argued that people who are abducted by aliens and who experience the “missing time” phenomenon, have been lifted, transported and relocated to other areas without their spouses being aware of anything amiss. That’s right, Timothy Conway believes that it is possible that Sai Baba molested alleged victims on another dimension, which is why it is so difficult for them to prove their allegations and why there is an abysmal lack of witnesses supporting their claims (Ref: Conway Email No. 10).

Nice “scholarly” referencing there, Mr. Priddles!

I am sure all those rationalists, atheists and skeptics that cite Robert Priddy on their Anti-Baba webpages are in for a rude awakening!

Robet Priddy erroneously accused Gerald Joe Moreno of “libeling” Timothy Conway. Needless to say, Timothy Conway has never himself accused Moreno of “libel”. Apparently, anything negative said about Ex-Devotees amounts to “libel” in the perverted and extremist mind of Robert Priddy (who has openly libeled Moreno as being sexually molested by Sathya Sai Baba).

Concluding Statement: Robert Priddy The Con Artist

Needless to say, Robert Priddy has a long and established history of distortions, lies, defamations and libels.

• Robert C. Priddy is a laughable pervert who had the audacity to fabricate sexual molestation claims against Gerald Joe Moreno.
• Robert C. Priddy is a laughable con-artist who published fraudulent screencaps against Gerald Joe Moreno and adamantly refuses to vindicate his claims by publishing full screencaps to Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain.
• Robert C. Priddy is a laughable stooge who attributed his own computer’s IP to Gerald Joe Moreno.
• Robert C. Priddy is in perpetual denial and publicly defends his laughable SheilaWaring Lie even though other critics have distanced themselves from that controversy.
• Robert Priddy is a laughable LSD Advocate who even cited a Pro-Drug Forum intended for Drug Users to defend his LSD-induced hallucinations.
• Senile Robert Priddy stated that Moreno claimed he was sexually abused under his Joe Apodaca SaiPetition.net Submission even though Moreno never made such a claim.
• Robert Priddy is a Pseudo-Moralist Clown who loves to attack others for composite images while endorsing and publishing composite images himself!
• Robert Priddy delusionally claimed that Sathya Sai Baba Personally Invited Him To India.
• Robert Priddy formerly Worshipped & Kissed Sathya Sai Baba’s feet.
• Robert Priddy Maliciously Lied About Joy Thomas and refuses to retract his bold-faced lies.
• Robert Priddy claimed he had a Telepathic Connection To Sathya Sai Baba.
• Robert Priddy documented a Homoerotic Dream With His Former Guru that involved the guru sucking up and swallowing a substance associated with his sex chakra!
• The list goes on and on.

Of course, none of these things are surprising considering that Robert Priddy is an LSD Advocate who is thoroughly obsessed with genital oilings and who relishes projecting his homoerotic fantasies onto Moreno. Robert Priddy is allied with Bisexual & Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson and Child Porn Purveyor RFJ Sandt. Robert Priddy is also a staunch promoter of New Age Advocate & Reincarnator Alan Kazlev and Guru & UFO Promoter Timothy Conway (who actually believes that Sathya Sai Baba may have molested alleged victims like aliens are alleged to do through abductions!).

The only people guily of running “massive disinformation and cover-up campaigns” are Robert Priddy and Ex-Devotees who have attacked hundreds of Sai Devotees & Non-Devotees alike and who have created hundreds of webpages to defame, libel and smear Gerald Joe Moreno. What more can one do but laugh at loud at Robert Priddy and his hypocritical finger-pointing?

Robert Priddy And Conny Larsson – Masters Of Two-Bit Triviality

Homoerotic Fantasizer Robert Priddy and Psychic Trance Medium Conny Larsson (both caustic critics and laughable defamers of Sathya Sai Baba and others) have been so determined and desperate in their smear campaigns against Gerald Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist) they have ridiculously accused Moreno of “submitting” Ex-Devotee’s names to pornography websites and then “publicizing” it!

This screencap provides the so-called “proof” that Robert Priddy and Conny Larsson cited against Moreno.

Because Moreno’s blog titles and blog descriptions appeared on pornography websites, Robert Priddy and Conny Larsson alleged that Moreno must have “submitted” and “publicized” his own articles through pornography websites! This self-serving argument puts Robert Priddy in a tenuous position.

If Priddy & Larsson’s claims are true (they aren’t) then this must mean that Robert Priddy “submitted” and “publicized” his webpages through pornography websites because his webpage links, webpage descriptions and webpage titles similarly appeared on pornographic websites. See For Yourself.

Needless to say, Robert Priddy and Conny Larsson (internet newbies who continually embarrass themselves with their idiotic cyber-sleuthing; such as The Bogus IPs and The Laughable SheilaWaring Lie) are apparently unaware of the reality of pornography spamdexing. Whenever any webpage discusses sexual content (which is invariably the case when discussing Ex-Devotees and their bizarre and deviant sexual obsessions), pornography websites attempt to obtain higher rankings by stealing titles and descriptions that will help them get higher internet traffic.

It is 100% true that Robert Priddy’s primary Anti-Sai webpage was indexed on porn sites because Priddy paid to get his Anti-Sai Site listed on SeekInsider.com (which is a no longer existent, pay-per-click Search Engine) under the Category: “World Wide Sex Com – World Wide Sex Directory – World Wide Sex” (View Google Cache)! Guess Robert Priddy did not have the foresight to see that by listing his website on a World Wide Sex Directory, porn sites would index his site for content! Of course, none of this is surprising considering that Robert Priddy is an LSD Advocate who is thoroughly obsessed with genital oilings and relishes projecting his homoerotic fantasies onto Moreno.

Robert Priddy’s criticisms against Moreno are a source of great amusement considering that Robert Priddy is very good buddies with openly bisexual Conny Larsson (who is admittedly sexually attracted to men and who is no stranger to homosexual sex)!

Of course, Robert Priddy and his psychic & bisexual buddy Conny Larsson cannot provide a scintilla of credible proof that Moreno “submitted” and “publicized” his articles through pornography websites. The so-called “proof” that Robert Priddy and Conny Larsson cited against Moreno only serves to implicate them as well. Too bad Conny Larsson’s psychic prowess couldn’t save Robert Priddy from even more public embarrassment. Tsk.

Reality Of Pornography Spamdexing:

- OrganicSpam.com About Spamdexing
- Wikipedia Article About Spamdexing
- Moodle Addresses Spamdexing
- Spamdexing – The Bane Of Search Engine Optimization
- Musa Aykac Writes About Spamdexing

Reinier Van Der Sandt – Webmaster To Largest Websites Attacking Sathya Sai Baba

This article will cover the following topics:

• RFJ van der Sandt – A Fundamentalist Christian?
• Posts By Reinier Van Der Sandt On The PvdA Amsterdam Forum
• RFJ Sandt And The Setting Captives Free Website
• Reinier Van Der Sandt Refuses To Deny He Is A Christian
• RFJ Sandt Posted A Christian Banner On The ExBaba Domain
• R.F.J. Sandt Defended A Convicted Christian Sex Offender
• Reinier Van Der Sandt’s Admission To Viewing Child Pornography
• Reinier Van Der Sandt’s Numerous Fake Names
• Reinier Van Der Sandt – The ExBaba Webmaster – In Conclusion

Reinier van der Sandt is the webmaster to the largest Anti-Baba websites on the world-wide-web. Although Reinier van der Sandt has never seen or followed Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba, he has waged public, extensive and gutter smear campaigns against the guru on the internet (in a variety of languages) and has created the following websites that contain or redirect to Anti-Sai material:

• home.hccnet.nl/cmg.vdsandt/ (Active: Contains Anti-Sai material)
• exbaba.startmee.nl/ (Active: Contains Anti-Sai material)
• home.hetnet.nl/mr_2/121/ex-baba/ (Recently inactivated framed version that loaded the hetnet.nl/~exbaba domain)
• home.hetnet.nl/~comments_on/_the_secret_swami/_sai_baba.htm (Active: 9 Files: Anti-Sai material)
• home.hetnet.nl/~pictures/afbeeldingen/pictures.html (Active: Anti-Sai material)
• exbaba.com/ (Active: Anti-Sai website)
• exbaba.nl/ (Active: Anti-Sai website)
• home.hetnet.nl/~ex-baba/ (Redirects to rfjvds.dds.nl domain)
• home.hetnet.nl/~ex-baba/ (Redirects to rfjvds.dds.nl domain)
• exbaba.de.tf/ (Active: German Anti-Sai site)
• home.hetnet.nl/mr_9/44/ex_baba/engels/shortnews/GuruGallery/ (Active: Contains Anti-Sai material)
• rfjvds.dds.nl/ (Active: Contains Anti-Sai material)
• home.hetnet.nl/~vid.eos/videos/cheating_baba01.wmv (Active: 11 files: Contains Anti-Sai material)
• home.hetnet.nl/~gurubusters/gurubusters.wmv (Active: Contains Anti-Sai material)
• home.hetnet.nl/~seduced/seduced.wmv (Active: Contains Anti-Sai material)
• members.tripod.com/the_findings/ (Active: Redirects to the exbaba.com site)
• members.lycos.nl/EXBABA/ (Active: Provides redirect link for the exbaba.com site)
• home.wanadoo.nl/~rvdsandt/ (Active: Contains the Mail-Forms from Anti-Sai sites)
• exbabablog.wordpress.com (Active: Anti-Sai blog)
• groups.yahoo.com/group/exbaba/ (Active: Anti-Sai Yahoo! Group)

Since Reinier Van Der Sandt has never seen or followed Sathya Sai Baba, the questions naturally arise: WHY is Reinier van der Sandt so intent in his agenda against Sathya Sai Baba and why does he operate numerous Anti-Baba websites for “ex-devotees” when he is not even an “ex-devotee” himself?

RFJ van der Sandt – A Fundamentalist Christian?
Let us take a closer look at some startling facts about RFJ Sandt that rightly raise the strong suspicion that he is a Fundamentalist Christian with a religious agenda against Bhagavan Sri Sathya Sai Baba.

Revealing Posts By Reinier Van Der Sandt On The PvdA Amsterdam Forum:
On an Amsterdam forum, Reinier Van Der Sandt responded thrice to a post written by Rob Oudkerk and wrote:

DUTCH:
Stoppen met Porno
gepost op: zaterdag 17 januari 2004 – 12:27:17

Stoppen met porno sites bezoeken had je nog niet gehad Rob.

Hier heb ik een goed adres voor als je er van af wilt komen (mocht je dit willen).

http://www.settingcaptivesfree.com

Het is een gratis cursus, maar bij les 30 vragen ze een vrijwillige bijdrage.

Bij mij heeft het gewerkt, en mijn leven is nu een stuk makkelijker geworden!

Reinier van der Sandt

ENGLISH:
Stop Porn
Posted on: Saturday, January 17, 2004 – 12:27:17

You have not stopped with the porn sites yet Rob.

Here I have a good address for you when want to come off (if you want).

http://www.settingcaptivesfree.com

It is a free course, but after 30 questions there is a voluntary contribution.

For me it worked, and my life is now much easier!

Reinier van der Sandt (Archive.org Reference)

---

DUTCH:
Gecondoleerd
gepost op: dinsdag 20 januari 2004 – 01:10:52

Hallo Rob,

Jammer joh, ik lees het net op Teletekst, je hebt je baan opgegeven, misschien had je toch met alles moeten stoppen, en dus ook met pornosites kijken wat je niet in je verhaal genoemd had en je prostituee bezoek, jammer, ik had toch nog gehoopt dat je aan zou blijven.

Groeten,

Reinier van der Sandt

ENGLISH:
Loss
Posted on: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 – 01:10:52

Hi Rob,

Too bad man. I just read it on Teletext, you have given your job, maybe you do everything to stop, and therefore also to see what porn sites you mentioned in your story and you had a visit from a prostitute, unfortunately, I had still hoped that you would continue.

Regards,

Reinier van der Sandt (Archive.org Reference)

---

DUTCH:
Afscheidscadeau
gepost op: dinsdag 20 januari 2004 – 01:21:51

Hallo Rob,

Nou, bij deze dan stuur ik je een filmpje van De Vieze Man (Koot en Bie), moge De Vieze Man, die door zeer velen gewaardeerd werd je tot troost zijn, ik hoop dat de toegevoegde html de link klikbaar maakt,

http://home.wanadoo.nl/~rvdsandt/videos/kootenbie.wmv

Groeten!
Reinier van der Sandt

ENGLISH:
Farewell Gift
Posted on: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 – 01:21:51

Hi Rob,

Well, by then I’ll send you a video of The Dirty Man (Koot and Bie), may The Dirty Man, which was appreciated by very many people to comfort you, I hope that with the added html the link is clickable,

http://home.wanadoo.nl/~rvdsandt/videos/kootenbie.wmv

Regards!
Reinier van der Sandt (Archive.org Reference)

About these posts, Reinier Van Der Sandt adamantly denied he wrote them and said on the former sathyasaibaba2 Yahoo! Group (underlined emphasis added by Moreno):

RFJ Sandt: I noticed that ex_baba@… has removed all his messages, from what is now Yahoo, I conclude that Mrs Lisa de Witt is trying to provoke some rumour, well, I can calmly say this: nor the Dutch message, nor the hate mails on Joe Moreno’s site are mine.

Until now I didn’t know (thanks Lisa!) of the existence of the Dutch message, and I have immediately asked the server to remove it, since I would NEVER put up such a WEIRD message on the internet!

Truth will always prevail, we will continue our fight against injustice, fraud, trickery and sexual abusive behaviour, all committed by the Cult of Sathya Sai Baba and Sai Baba himself, in India. (Reference)

After Moreno outted Reinier Van Der Sandt for using numerous fake names on the former sathyasaibaba2 Yahoo! Group (which Sandt later admitted using), he decided to come clean and claimed that he did in fact author the posts on the Amsterdam forum and even reposted them back! See For Yourself (Go To The Bottom Of The Page). How “weird” is that? RFJ Sandt was telling his bold-faced lies even as he wrote about continuing the fight against “injustice, fraud, trickery” and how the “truth will always prevail” (Screencap Reference)!

RFJ Sandt And The Setting Captives Free Website:
On the Amsterdam forum Reinier van der Sandt clearly implied that settingcaptivesfree.com helped him overcome his own addiction to pornography. In the post entitled “Stop Porn”, RFJ Sandt specifically told Rob Oudkerk that when he was ready to give up pornography, he could try using the Fundamentalist Christian website SettingCaptivesFree.com because that website worked for him (clearly implying that settingcaptivesfree.com could help Rob Oudkerk overcome his addiction to pornography just as settingcaptivesfree.com helped Reinier overcome his addiction to pornography). This is important to remember because Reinier Van Der Sandt openly boasted about viewing child pornography (more about this later).

SettingCaptivesFree.com is a Fundamentalist Christian website run by the Ohio Valley Church (Ref) that requires one to register for a course to overcome one’s addictions. Registrants must accept their Statement Of Faith as part of their “therapy”. The Ohio Valley Church’s Mission And Statement Of Faith says:

Mission and Statement of Faith

Our Mission: To spread the gospel and make devoted disciples of Jesus Christ. As followers of Jesus Christ, we believe the following truths are taught in the Scriptures:

The Word of God
The Bible alone, consisting of the sixty-six books of the Old and New Testaments, is the Word of God. It is fully inspired and without error in the original manuscripts, written under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, and has supreme authority in all matters of faith and life.

The Trinity
There is One living and true God, eternally existing in three Persons. They are equal in every divine perfection and They execute distinct but harmonious offices in the work of creation, providence and redemption.

God the Father
God the Father is the infinite, eternal and almighty personal Spirit, perfect in holiness, wisdom, power and love, and is the first Person of the Trinity. He concerns Himself mercifully in the affairs of people; He hears and answers prayer, and He saves from sin and death all who come to Him in repentance and faith through Jesus Christ.

Jesus Christ
Jesus Christ is God’s only begotten Son; He was conceived by the Holy Spirit and is the second Person of the Trinity. He was miraculously born of a virgin, lived a sinless life, and performed miracles. We affirm His incarnation, teachings, substitutionary atoning death, bodily resurrection, ascension into heaven, perpetual intercession for His people, and His future personal, visible return to earth. Jesus Christ is the only mediator between God the Father and humanity.

The Holy Spirit
The Holy Spirit is the third Person of the Trinity and is sent from the Father and Son to convict the world of sin, righteousness and judgment, and to regenerate, sanctify and empower all who believe in Jesus Christ. At the moment of salvation the Holy Spirit, as the abiding Helper, Teacher and Guide, indwells every believer in Christ and endows each believer with spiritual gifts for ministry to the family of God and the world.

Salvation
The central purpose of God’s revelation in the Bible is to call all people into awareness of their sin, the availability of God’s marvelous grace, and the need for repentance and faith that results in complete forgiveness of sin and fellowship with God. All people are sinners by nature and by choice and are, therefore, under the judgment and wrath of God. Those who are chosen by God the Father are regenerated by the Holy Spirit into a new life in Jesus Christ; they come to believe in Jesus’ death and resurrection as full payment for their sin and the complete removal of their guilt; they repent of their sin and call on the Lord Jesus Christ for forgiveness, and receive Him as their Lord and Savior. These are granted salvation and forgiveness of their sin, and this act of salvation is based solely on the grace and mercy of God, not the result of human desire, decision, or deeds. This salvation results in a heart and life change, the evidence of which is that the believer begins to grow in holiness and to live a life of ever-increasing good works.

Future Destiny
The Lord Jesus Christ will come again to earth, personally and visibly, to establish His kingdom and fulfill God’s eternal plan for creation. Death seals the eternal destiny of each person. For each person, there will be a resurrection of the body and the final judgment before God; eternal bliss in heaven for those who are in Christ Jesus, and endless suffering in hell for those who have not received salvation.

The Church
The Church consists of a living spiritual body, of which Christ is the head and all regenerated persons are members. It exists as both a worldwide fellowship of the family of God, as well as in specific local congregations consisting of believers in Jesus Christ who are committed to obedience to Him. Believers in a local church are called by God to gather together to devote themselves to worship, prayer, the teaching of the Word of God, observance of baptism and communion as ordinances established by Jesus Christ, and to fellowship and to minister to one another through the development and use of talents and spiritual gifts. God has laid upon the members of the local church the primary task of proclaiming the Gospel of Jesus Christ to the world, beginning in their own communities and reaching cross-culturally to the ends of the earth.

The Ordinances
The Lord Jesus Christ has instituted two ordinances for obedient observance by the local church: baptism and the Lord’s Supper. Christian baptism is the immersion of a believer in water in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Baptism does not constitute salvation, but is a public profession of faith that a person has already experienced salvation. The Scriptures teach that the elements of Communion, or the Lord’s Supper, have no mystical or supernatural power, but were given by Jesus as symbols of the sacrifice of His body and blood as atonement for the sins of the world. These two ordinances are to be observed and administered by God’s family until the return of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Statement Of Faith Reference (DOC File)

Setting Captives Free advocates:

• For the literal and 100% inerrancy of the Bible.
• That all beings are sinful from conception.
• That Non-believers are to be “avoided”, “accursed” and “should not be welcomed into one’s house”.
• That the Devil is the cause of addiction.
• That “Heaven is the final destiny of every believer and hell the final destiny of every unbeliever”.

Moreno personally verified all this information for himself. Nevertheless, for those who doubt Moreno’s claims, these facts can be double-checked by registering for a free course on settingcaptivesfree.com or by perusing their website.

1. WHY would RFJ Sandt (as an alleged non-Christian) suggest a Fundamentalist Christian website to Rob Oudkerk that required him to accept Jesus Christ as his personal Savior?
2. WHY would RFJ Sandt (as an alleged non-Christian) take a course from a Fundamentalist Christian website that required him to accept Jesus Christ as his personal Savior?

Reinier Van Der Sandt Refuses To Deny He Is A Christian:
On the former sathyasaibaba2 Yahoo! Group, RFJ Sandt wrote a response to Moreno where he adamantly refused to disclose his religious beliefs. As a matter of fact, RFJ Sandt wrote:

JM: Perhaps because Reinier van der Sandt is a Fundamentalist Christian.

RvdS: What Reinier van der Sandt is or believes is only known by himself and none of Joe (Gerald) Moreno’s business. (Reference)

Although RFJ Sandt tries to make the case that he is not a Fundamentalist Christian, he has never once denied that he is a Christian!

Here are two posts made by Mr. Sandt (on the internet) advocating for his own personal faith in Jesus Christ (underlined emphasis added by Moreno):

Ref: rfjvds.dds.nl/ex-baba/engels/articles/simonis.html
R.F.J. Sandt: “So, the present-day believers have to choose which direction. The Pope from Italy or Sai Baba from India, the practicing pedophile? From the above-mentioned, it may be clear that every way to come to the deepening of our consciousness concerning our faith, including the Pope in Rome, is much better than the way which is followed by the disciples of Sai Baba, so don’t be deceived by wonders, the romantic residence and impressive appearance of Sai Baba, he misleads the trustful common herd.”

Ref: rfjvds.dds.nl/ex-baba/engels/articles/saibible.html
R.F.J. Sandt: “It is obvious that the SSB’s Christian devotees don’t place much importance on how he manipulates the scriptures. It is also obvious that, regardless of the large population of Christians in this world, many of them are not practicing their faith nor are they very well versed in the scriptures.”

In these two passages, RFJ Sandt contrasted himself (and his understanding of Christian scriptures) against the “large population of Christians” who are not practicing their faith because they are not well versed in Christian scriptures. Reinier van der Sandt implied he is well versed with Christian scriptures and fully practices the Christian faith.

Reinier van der Sandt lumped “present-day believers” into two groups:

• Group 1: Those who are for the Pope in Italy.
• Group 2: Those who are for Sathya Sai Baba.

We know that RVD Sandt does not belong to Group 2 so that leaves Group 1 (i.e., those who are for the Pope in Italy).

A Fundamentalist Christian is generally defined as someone who accepts the following beliefs:

1. The Bible is the inspired Word Of God.
2. Jesus Christ is accepted as one’s personal Lord and Savior.
3. Jesus is the only way to heaven and/or God.
4. One must confess him/her self as a sinner.

Reinier Van Der Sandt also authored three articles against Sathya Sai Baba entitled:

1. “Sai Baba is detrimental to the gospel of Jesus Christ”
2. “First letter to Cardinal Simonis”
3. “Second letter to Cardinal Simonis”

Consequently, RFJ Sandt’s Christian beliefs are obvious to those who have eyes to see and ears to hear.

Reinier Van Der Sandt Posted A Christian Banner On The ExBaba Domain:
It is also a fact that Reinier van der Sandt posted a Christian Banner on the ExBaba Domain in March 2006 that went to the Fundamentalist Christian website Pastoraat-SOS, which is directly affiliated with Bijbel Centraal NL.

Once Moreno pointed out that the largest Anti-Baba website on the internet was soliciting a Christian website in the Netherlands (Ref), R.F.J. Sandt rushed to do damage control and removed the banner (but not before Moreno screencaptured it).

WHY would RFJ Sandt (as an alleged non-Christian) post a Christian banner on the Ex-Baba domain that directly linked to a Fundamentalist Christian website if he is not a Christian?

R.F.J. Sandt Defended A Convicted Christian Sex Offender:
R.F.J. Sandt tried to defend Anton Hein (a convicted Christian sex offender) in one of seventy-seven attack webpages he made against Moreno in 36 days (which is comparable to Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy’s current & loose smear-campaigns against Moreno on WordPress).

Reinier van der Sandt attacked Alan Kazlev (whom he called Moreno’s “buddy and co-worker – two liars in one”) for making a comment about an Evangelical Christian sex offender stumping against Sathya Sai Baba. Reinier van der Sandt foamed-at-the-mouth and said the accusation against Anton Hein was “totally untrue”, a “baseless, dirty lie” and a “gutter tactic one has to use to defend your alleged child-assaulting homosexual guru”.

However, there is verifiable evidence about Anton Hein’s known status as a sex offender in California. As a matter of fact, Anton Hein spent time in prison for the offence 288a (which is for lewd or lascivious act of a child who is under the age of 14 years of age). Anton Hein even discussed this issue on his own website! This goes to show how poorly R.F.J. Sandt researches his (dis)information and how he is willing to defend his Christian buddies, even if they are known sex offenders who flee from the law!

Anton and Janet Hein-Hudson are the fundamentalist Christian webmasters for apologeticsindex.org, a website that specifically took aim at Sathya Sai Baba (it still does but now more indirectly). Anton William Hein was a minister in California who sexually molested a child and was convicted of the crime “Lewd Act Upon A Child”.

Click Here to read the following:

“For the crime of ‘LEWD ACT UPON A CHILD’ Anton William Hein pleaded no contest in July 1994 in San Bernardino County Municipal Court and spent about 6 months in jail filed in July 1994. After his release from Prison, Mr. Hein moved to Holland.”

Anton Hein now denies having molested the child. Click Here to view his response to these charges. Click Here to view more debate. For independent verification, Click Here and enter the last name of “Hein” and the first name of “Anton” and then click on “HEIN” and see for yourself that he has a felony warrant out for his arrest as of April 2009!

Another instance of Reinier Van Der Sandt defending his Christian buddies, even if they are known sex offenders! So who exactly is resorting to “gutter tactics” and telling “baseless, dirty lies” now?

The following is Anton Hein’s former “statement of faith” (which he removed in an deceitful attempt to portray his Anti-Cult websites as being “independent” and “neutral”):

Anton William Hein: I regard these beliefs as essential to Christian faith and practice:

I believe that there is one living and true God who eternally exists in three distinct persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, equal in power and glory; that He has revealed Himself to be perfect in love, holiness and righteousness; that He created all, upholds all and governs all. (Matthew 12:25-27; John 1:1-2, 10:30, 14:26, 15:26).

I believe that the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are given by divine inspiration and are the written Word of God, the final authority for the lives of believers in every culture and age, and the infallible rule of faith and practice. They are to be interpreted according to their context and purpose and in reverent obedience to the living Word, who speaks through them in the power of the Holy Spirit. The primary purpose of the Scriptures is to lead to faith in Jesus and salvation in His name. (Psalm 119:89; Isaiah 40:8; John 5:39-40; 2 Timothy 3:16-17; Hebrews 4:12).

I believe in God the Father, an infinite personal Spirit, perfect in wisdom, power and love; that He concerns Himself mercifully in the affairs of men through His providence and His power, that He hears and answers prayers; that He has created all and is able to recreate all who come to Him through Jesus Christ. (Genesis 1:1; Psalm 19:1, 102:25-27; Matthew 7:11; Ephesians 1:3-6).

I believe in Jesus Christ, God’s one and only Son, conceived by the Holy Spirit, both true God and true man. I believe in His virgin birth, sinless life, and fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies of the Messiah; I believe in His miracles, teaching, substitutionary atoning death, bodily ressurection, and ascension into heaven, His continual intercession for His people and His personal, visible return to earth. (Matthew 1:20-23, 5:15-18; Romans 1:4; 1 Corinthians 15:1-17; 1 Thessalonians 4:13-18; Philippians 2:5-11; Hebrews 2:4, 4:15, 7:25, 10:19-20).

I believe in the Holy Spirit, who came forth from the Father and Son to convict the world of sin, righteousness and judgement, and to regenerate, sanctify and empower for ministry all who believe in Christ; I believe the Holy Spirit indwells every believer in Jesus Christ and He is an abiding Helper, Teacher, Gift-giver and Guide. I believe that through the indwelling Holy Spirit we can experience a progressive liberation from the bondage of Satan, the world and sin; that He brings a present though partial reality of the Kingdom of God as He acts in and through our lives with sovereign supernatural power. (John 16:7-15; Acts 1:8, 2:38-39; Romans 8:5-16; 1 Corinthians 12:7-11; 2 Corinthians 3:17-18; Galatians 3:2-5, 5:16-25).

I believe that man (man and woman) was created in Gods image, was tempted by the devil, and subsequently rebelled against God. Men and women are now fallen in nature, and evidence this condition in sinful deeds. Thus they are sinners by anture and choice and therefore under condemnation. God regenerates those who repent of their sins and confess Jesus Christ as Lord, declares them righteous (justification), forgives them of their sins, adopts them as His children, baptizes them with the Holy Spirit as a guarantee of their future resurrection and inheritance with Christ, incorporates them into His body and empowers them for His service. (Genesis 3:1-13, 16-19; Romans 5:12-19, 7:14-25, 8:1-4; 2 Corinthians 5:17-18; Galatians 4:4-7; Ephesians 2:8-10; James 1:18).

I believe that the believer posesses great authority through Christ over the powers of spiritual darkness led by Satan, the ruler of this world. I believe we actively exercise this authority as we pray, do spiritual warfare, walk by faith, exercise spiritual gifts and progress to spiritual maturity in Christ. I believe that Satan and demons are personal, intelligent beings who have been defeated in their rebellion by Christ, who will destroy them eternally when he returns to bring His Kingdom to earth. (Matthew 12:28; Luke 9:1-2; 2 Corinthians 4:4-5, 10:3-5; Ephesians 6:10-17; Colossians 2:15; Hebrews 2:14-15; 1 Peter 5:8-9).

I believe in the universal Church, the living spiritual body of which Christ is the Head and all regenerated persons are members. I believe that the Lord Jesus Christ commited two ordinances to the church: baptism and communion. Though I practice only believers baptism by immersion, I recognize and respect the variation of practice of these ordinances and affirm the unity of the Body. I believe that communion should be open to all believers, leaving it to them to decide their own readiness to participate. (Matthew 16:18-19; Luke 22:14-20; Acts 2:38-41; Romans 6:3-4; 1 Corinthians 11:23-31).

I believe in the personal, visible return of Christ to earth to raise the dead, judge the world, consumate his Glorious Kingdom and bestow eternal blessing on the righteous. This is the hope of the church. (Matthew 24:30; Luke 9:1-2; 2 Corinthians 4:4-5, 10:3-5; Ephesians 6:10-17; Colossians 2:15; Hebrews 2:14-15; 2 Peter 3:8-9).

I believe that all who have been baptized into Jesus Christ by water and Spirit are thereby obligated and enabled to obey God’s word and repent when they sin. Those who confess Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord should pursue a life of obedience and holiness. Those who persist in sin should be warned and, if merited, disciplined. (Matthew 18:15-17; 1 Corinthians 10:13; Romans 6:5-11; 1 John 3:4-10).

Anton (Archive.org Reference)

It is also significant to note that Reinier van der Sandt claimed that “no evangelical Christians have ever had anything to do with the exposé”. Of course, this is a blatant untruth. The very first Westerner to write against Sathya Sai Baba was Tal Brooke, a fundamentalist and evangelical Christian who has directly corresponded with Ex-Devotees, including Barry Pittard. 99% of the allegations against Sathya Sai Baba can be traced or connected to Tal Brooke and his religiously fueled propaganda against the Guru.

Reinier Van Der Sandt’s Admission To Viewing Child Pornography:
Reinier van der Sandt openly admitted to looking for child porn websites to see how easy they were to find! Reinier van der Sandt said (underlined emphasis added by Moreno):

Reinier Van Der Sandt: “I found lots of kiddy porno-sites with very much child porn pics, but…, but… it was impossible for me to watch it for very long, because when I was clicking on an image to enlarge, other pages were popping up so fast on my computer screen, that I could not open such a site, in fact, all kiddy porno sites – as what I have seen of it – have multi pop up techniques, which makes it difficult for the kiddy porno watcher to watch easily…” (Reference)

WHY would Reinier van der Sandt want to peruse any porn site and enlarge thumbnail pictures of children being sexually abused? Perhaps this has to do with RFJ Sand’s self-admission of having a pornography problem that settingcaptivesfree helped him overcome? As if this isn’t disgusting enough, R.V.D. Sandt said (underlined emphasis added by Moreno):

Reinier Van Der Sandt: “Only in the opening pages I saw some kiddy porn, when I wanted to continue and see more, I had to suscribe and/or pay.” (Reference)

Reinier vander Sandt tried to justify viewing illegal child porn sites by saying:

Reinier Van Der Sandt: “Internet kiddy porno can be obtained, I have to correct myself on what I was previously writing on this board, I have been looking for kiddy porn on the internet – NOT AS A CUSTOMER, BUT BECAUSE I WANTED TO FIND OUT WHETHER ONE CAN OBTAIN EASILY FILTHY KIDDIE PORNO!!!” (Reference)

Apparently Reinier Van Der Sandt found the “filthy kiddie porno” he sought. But that was not enough! RVD Sandt found “lots of kiddie porno sites”, “wanted to continue and see more” and even tried to enlarge pictures of children being sexually abused! Reinier Van Der Sandt justified his behavior by saying what he did was alright because he was “not a customer”! RVD Sandt is saying it is OKAY to view child pornography as long as you are not a “customer”! The IWF specifically states that child pornography is illegal content!

To Date: Pseudo-Moralists Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy adamantly refuse to say one word about Reinier Van Der Sandt’s admission to viewing illegal child pornography. Of course, Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy also adamantly refuse to say one word about Ex-Devotee Conny Larsson and how he is peddling himself as an internationally renowned Psychic Trance Medium and Self-Proclaimed Prophet. Robert Priddy bashed psychics and mediums on his Anti-Baba blog as being “absurd charlatans” and one can only wonder how Robert Priddy would reconcile his beliefs about psychics and mediums with the Ex-Devotee Conny Larsson.

Reinier Van Der Sandt’s Numerous Fake Names:
It is also an irrefutable fact that RFJ Sandt used numerous fake names on the former sathyasaibaba2 Yahoo Group. As a matter of fact, RFJ Sandt fully acknowledged using fake names. RFJ van der Sandt said:

Reinier Van Der Sandt: “Allright, you win, Joe (Gerald) Moreno is right… I have made these pages, and Joe is right, all the YAHOO ID’s and the IP are mine, I use them to show my view on the truth, but I will change this, in future I will be only using my name on these sites and the different ID’s will be deleted by me, ok?” (Reference)

The following list of fraudulent names were the ones used by RFJ Sandt on the former sathyasaibaba2 Yahoo Group (with which he even had imaginary conversations with himself):

• sloppyjoemoreno (26 posts)
• webmasterexbabacom (5 posts)
• rvdsandt2003 (200 posts)
• rvdsandt2004 (112 posts)
• end_of_baba (12 posts)
• rapistanddemonsathyasaibaba (336 posts)
• neutral_individual (6 posts)
• finddewittinthepizza (2 posts)
• reiniervandersandt (298 posts)
• reiniervdsandt (204 posts)
• truthaboutbaba (42 posts)

Reinier van der Sandt also posted two pictures of Sathya Sai Baba on the former sathyasaibaba2 Yahoo Group that depicted the guru as a baboon (Ref) and that depicted the guru as holding a barbell with his penis (Ref).

To Date: One will not find a single word of disapproval from pseudo-moralist Robert Priddy about RFJ Sandt’s self-admitted use of fraudulent internet names. Probably because Robert Priddy uses bogus internet nics himself, like he did on QuickTopic. Nor will one find a single word of disapproval from pseudo-moralist Robert Priddy about RFJ Sandt’s image of a “pornographic kind”.

Reinier Van Der Sandt – The ExBaba Webmaster – In Conclusion
Since Mr. Reinier van der Sandt goes to great extents to distort the truth (from viewing child pornography to saying that his lies are simply a matter of being “creative” to using fake names to making bogus screencaps to denying he made posts on the Amsterdam forum to numerous retractions, etc.), his answers and explanations cannot be trusted. Rather, one must rely on objective observations regarding Reinier van der Sandt’s online behavior.

When Reinier van der Sandt indirectly argued that he is not a Christian, how can one believe him when the facts and his actions speak volumes for him to the contrary? One must also remember that RFJ Sandt has never once denied being a Christian. Apparently, he is taking issue with the “fundamentalist” label.

RFJ van der Sandt should thank Robert Priddy for the creation of this article. After all, Robert Priddy was the one who “challenged” Moreno to substantiate his belief that Reinier van der Sandt is a fundamentalist Christian. However, Robert Priddy (like a true coward and hypocrite) continually ignores Moreno’s challenges, especially in relation to self-professed Psychic Medium Conny Larsson, reincarnator Alan Kazlev, UFO advocate and Guru solicitor Timothy Conway, decade-long drug addict and alcoholic Alaya Rahm, full screencaptures to the Vishvarupa webpages, Reinier’s child pornography admissions, Sanjay’s streetbitches blog, the Joy Thomas lie, etc. Apparently, Robert Priddy is one of those self-serving hypocrites who loves to mutter challenges but is unwilling to accept them.

Barry Pittard, Robert Priddy and other Ex-Devotees purposely ignore Reinier van der Sandt’s gutter behaviors, bold-faced lies and shocking admissions even though they ceaselessly prattle about “morality”, “honesty” and “ethics”! These are the types of stooges and clowns that are attempting to “expose” Sathya Sai Baba.

Theist Timothy Conway Referenced Atheist Basava Premanand

PhD Timothy Conway said the following about Basava Premanand (an Atheist, Rationalist and Skeptic who published the Indian Skeptic tabloid):

Timothy Conway: “Though I disagree strongly with his atheist philosophy and rationalist-skeptic approach, the Indian former SSB devotee (1968-74) turned India’s most notorious ‘guru-buster,’ Basava Premanand, a decades-long critic of Sathya Sai in his periodical Indian Skeptic, also deserves acknowledgment here as one taking a firm and enduring stand for accountability and justice, not just in the case of SSB but with other problematic figures as well. (On the case against SSB, see Premanand’s bulky books, including Murders in Sai Baba’s Bed Room, 2004, and, most recently, Failed Sabotage by SSB through Gerald Moreno, 2007, etc., published by the author at 11/7, Chettipalayam Rd., Podanur 641 023, Tamil Nadu, India)”

First and foremost, Basava Premanand was never a Sai Devotee as erroneously alleged by PhD Timothy Conway. Click Here to view screen captures to SaiPetition.net, Robert Priddy’s Ex-Office Bearers Page and the BBC text to the Secret Swami Documentary. Basava Premanand personally made a submission to SaiPetition.net (which was subsequently replicated on Robert Priddy’s Ex-Office Bearers Page) stating that he was a follower of Sathya Sai Baba from 1968 to 1974 and was the “best worker in the SSB Org., Podanur”. However, in the Secret Swami Documentary, Basava Premanand claimed he was never a follower of Sathya Sai Baba and had been trying to investigate the Guru since 1968 itself. Premanand joined the Sai Organization in an attempt to infiltrate it and expose Sai Baba.

In both the GuruBusters Documentary and the The Independent Article Premanand was said to have been exposing Gurus for nearly 50 years (since the age of 21-22). This means that in 1968 (at the age of 38, or 16 years after he was a rationalist) Premanand was not a follower of Sathya Sai Baba when he joined the Sai Organization in Podanur. Premanand lied about being a Sai Devotee (just as he lied about Moreno being sexually abused by Sai Baba, lied about an anonymous letter being written by a Sai Student, among numerous other blatant untruths).

One will also notice how the moralist PhD Timothy Conway cited Premanand’s book against Moreno on his “biggest and best website on spirituality”. Don’t expect Timothy Conway to divulge the fact that Basava Premanand shamelessly libeled Moreno in that book and that it contains numerous unsubstantiated defamations mostly from Robert Priddy (with citations to Brian Steel, Conny Larsson, Sanjay Dadlani and Alan Kazlev). Moreno discussed this issue in his article entitled Is Basava Premanand Senile, Confused, A Liar Or All Of The Above? and on his Indian Skeptic Page.

This is the type of sleaze, slime and defamatory material that PhD Timothy Conway cites against his detractors. PhD Timothy Conway is a pseudo-moralist and pseudo-spiritualist who must reference sleaze, slime and defamatory material because there is absolutely no verifiable, credible or legal information to support any of the criminal allegations made against Sathya Sai Baba. The fact that no one has even tried to file a basic police complaint or court case against Sathya Sai Baba in India is proof enough that the allegations against Baba lack substance and credibility. Neither Sathya Sai Baba nor the Sai Organization have ever been charged with any crime, sexual or otherwise (Refs: 01 – 02).

The burden of proof is on those making the allegations against Sathya Sai Baba. Those making the allegations (including Timothy Conway) have miserably failed to make any leeway against Sathya Sai Baba in a court of law in India despite their loud protests and cry-baby whining to the contrary.

Furthermore, Timothy Conway’s reference to Basava Premanand has amusing repercussions against him, his beliefs and his advocacy of Gurus, Enlightened Masters, Mystics, Hinduism and Eastern Philosophies because Basava Premanand believes that people who believe in these things are Guru promoters, blind believers, brainwashed devotees, cult advocates and superstitionists with weak intellects!

This is even more the case when considering that PhD Timothy Conway is a gullible true believer in Gurus [3], Mystics [3], Enlightened Masters [3], psychics [1] [2] [4], levitation [5], bi-location [5], miracles [5], remote-viewing [4], elementals, meditation [2] [6], paranormal powers [5], aliens [4] [10], rebirth [1] [7], reincarnation [1] [7], karma [8], oracles [2], I-Ching [2], sensitives [1] [2], channelers [1] [2], astrology [2], astrologists [2], palm-reading [2], non-duality [9], etc. (the list goes on and on).

Timothy Conway also attempted to argue that if Sai Baba possesses paranormal powers, he could easily “warp spacetime” by creating an “insular interdimensional environment” where he could engage in abuse without easy detection. That’s right, Timothy Conway believes that it is possible that Sai Baba molested alleged victims on another dimension, which is why it is so difficult for them to prove their allegations and why there is an abysmal lack of witnesses supporting their claims (Ref: Conway Email No. 10).

Attempting to sling mud at Sathya Sai Baba and his detractors, Timothy Conway ended up slinging mud on himself, his Gurus, his belief system and on innumerable religious and spiritual adherents whose beliefs were ridiculed and criticized by atheist Basava Premanand.

These are the types of three-ring circus clowns who are trying to “expose” Sathya Sai Baba.

Robert Priddy – A Dirty Old Man

Robert Priddy (a caustic critic and defamer of Sathya Sai Baba and others) made the following comments on his Anti-Sai conspiracy blog about Joe Moreno (a Pro-Sai Activist):

Robert Priddy: Exactly what happened to Moreno in the private interview? The reason for my interest is not prurience but entirely as an investigator and exposer of many described crimes by Sathya Sai Baba. Joe Moreno makes a big deal about not having stated that oil was “massaged” onto his lower stomach (as I claim), saying only that it was “applied”. How then? With a spatula or a sponge? No. It was from Sai Baba’s hand, he has made that clear enough. So was it not rubbed on? (ie. = massaged in?). That way is widely reported by those describing these oil molestations. Joe is VERY cagey indeed about HOW it was applied and exactly how low down, wanting at any cost to escape any idea that he was being ‘groomed’ to see if he would rise to the approach. He says this occurs between the navel and the pubic area… but plenty of others have explained that it includes the genitals. I am not saying that Joe experienced that, but I think Sai baba did take his pants down (he does, according to reports) or told him to do in words or gestures (as other who received his attentions have described). Or did Sai Baba put his hand inside his pants to reach the lower stomach? Or what? Let Moreno explain himself. Too embarrassing to admit, perhaps, what actually was the case?

This article is an addition to two former articles:

1. Sai Baba Critic Robert Priddy Openly Falsifies Molestation Claim
2. Sai Baba Critic Robert Priddy Falsifies Information About Joe Apodaca Signature

Robert Priddy’s fascination with Moreno’s interview experience with Sathya Sai Baba is not only one of “prurience”, it is one of sexual deviancy as well.

No matter how many clarifications, details or explanations Moreno may give, Robert Priddy will never be satisfied, will never let go of his lecherous fantasies and will never let go of his “too embarrassed to talk about it” argument.

Robert Priddy is a dirty old man that can’t stop obsessing, squirming and drooling over the possibility that Sathya Sai Baba did something sexual to Moreno (he didn’t). This type of sexual perversity is best left to psychiatrists, psychosexual therapists and the DSM-IV-TR. It would appear that Robert Priddy is the type of sadist who derives some sort of perverse sexual gratification in humiliating others by projecting his libidinous fantasies onto them.

Despite Moreno’s repeated and tireless clarifications about his interview experiences with Sathya Sai Baba, Robert Priddy continues to deny, distort and falsify Moreno’s account.

Moreno first addressed the sexual abuse libels made against him on July 3rd 2006 and a second time on September 19th 2006. Moreno published a detailed article in August 2007 refuting the sexual abuse libels made against him by Sanjay Dadlani, Tony O’Clery, Basava Premanand, Conny Larsson, Reineir Van Der Sandt, Barbara Dent, UsedByBaba and Alan Kazlev.

Moreno clearly stated that Sathya Sai Baba applied materialized, fragrant and green oil in one motion of his hand just beneath his belly button (i.e., “lower stomach”, not to be confused with one’s “lower abdomen” or “pubic” region). The oil was such that it promptly disappeared in contact with the skin and left no oily residue. Hence, no “massaging” required. Moreno divulged this information several years back and Robert Priddy continues to deny that Moreno ever made such clarifications!

As a matter of fact, Moreno said:

For those who have the integrity, honesty and decency to research the facts for him/her self, let me be absolutely clear about my oiling experience with Sathya Sai Baba:

I was not sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba.

Sathya Sai Baba did not rub oil on my genitals.

At no time were my pants pulled down or my genitals exposed.

Sathya Sai Baba smeared the oil, in one movement of his hand, just below my belly button. I was not fondled, kissed, massaged or touched in any other way indicative of questionable or inappropriate sexual behavior.

Sathya Sai Baba did not “command” me to observe celibacy. He confirmed I should follow a path I had chosen but had doubts about.

The oil promptly disappeared on contact with my skin. There was no oily residue left afterwards.

The oiling was not “pleasurable”, nor did I experience euphoria or any other kind of altered state for several weeks after its application.

Although Sathya Sai Baba did not tell me what the oil was for, he materialized the oil just after telling me about a severe gastrointestinal illness I endured (from which I lost a significant amount of weight in a short period of time) and after confirming to me that I should observe celibacy. Baba knew about my question concerning celibacy and my illness although I said nothing to him or anyone else at the ashram.

These are the facts of the matter. I think my statements (which have not changed in all these years) supersede the libelous, sexually-twisted, defamatory and deceitful claims made by Ex-Devotees against me, (who go around claiming I was sexually abused and fondled when I was not). Since my oiling experience does not fit into critic’s preconceived ideas about oilings (none of the currently vocal critics ever claimed having received one), they attempt to misrepresent and twist my words with sexual inferences. This speaks volumes about ex-devotees, their lack of character, their lack of dedication to the truth and their very disturbing sexual focus/perversity on everything relating to Sathya Sai Baba.

Ex-Devotees invalidate everything I say (all the while calling me a “liar”) yet apparently believe me when I said I had an oiling. They cherry-pick their criticisms to advance their own nefarious agendas and attempt to deceive the general public by harping on sincerity, honesty, morality and ethics! If ex-devotees lie like this about me, what does this say about their claims against Sathya Sai Baba?

Reference (or View The August 27th 2007 Archive)

The facts show that Moreno did make the clarifications that Robert Priddy demanded from him (although Priddy is in no position to make any demands from Moreno). As stated before, Robert Priddy will never be satisfied with Moreno’s clarifications and will continually resort to the “he is too embarrassed to talk about it” argument.

If Robert Priddy fabricates sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other sexual molestation claims is he fabricating as well?

When Robert Priddy believes that even those who deny being sexually molested were sexually molested, then one can better understand why Moreno refers to Robert Priddy as an “extremist”, a “fanatic”, a “pathological liar” and a “mentally unstable defamer”.

However, Moreno will make a few additional clarifications for interested readers:

1. Isn’t it strange that for someone who is alleged to have been “embarrassed” about being “molested sexually”, Moreno revealed the full details of his interview experience with Sathya Sai Baba on a public website (Ref)? Surely, if Moreno was so “embarrassed” about being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba, he would not have publicly mentioned it in the first place!
2. Sathya Sai Baba did not “gesture” or say “in words” for Moreno to lower his pants as graphically fantasized by Robert Priddy. As stated numerous times before, Moreno’s pants were never (ever) pulled down, loosened or touched.
3. Sathya Sai Baba did not (at any time) “put his hand inside” Moreno’s pants as graphically fantasized by Robert Priddy.
4. Moreno did not “want at any cost to escape any idea that he was being ‘groomed’ to see if he would rise to the approach” as graphically fantasized by Robert Priddy. Since Moreno’s genitals were never exposed or touched and since Sathya Sai Baba just finished confirming to Moreno that he should observe celibacy…how was that supposed to happen?

Robert Priddy’s arguments against Moreno are indicative of the type of conspiracy mentality and extremist mindset that makes him so utterly unbelievable. Robert Priddy would have the world believe that even those who deny being sexually molested, were. Robert Priddy would also have the world believe that his shabby conspiracies, fabricated statements and screwball speculations somehow trump Moreno’s first-hand comments and explanations!

Of course, Robert Priddy is the same guy who would have the world believe that his LSD-induced experiences were not hallucinatory in nature (although LSD is a hallucinogen)! Apparently, his telepathic connection with Eric Steadman, his “out of body experience” and his vision of broken bones sticking out of flesh from a broken wrist were not hallucinatory at all!…Which brings us back to Robert Priddy’s hallucinations about Joe Moreno & Sathya Sai Baba…The stuff drugs do to people’s brains!

Sai Baba Critic Robert Priddy Falsifies Information About Joe Apodaca Signature

Gerald Joe Moreno has had to write several “fighting the smears” articles to refute Robert Priddy’s internet propaganda, libels and complete disinformation against him.

In yet another illustrative example of Robert Priddy’s fairy-tale mentality (which appears to be the onslaught of senile dementia) is a complete and utter fabrication of facts against Moreno on his Anti-Baba conspiracy blog. Robert Priddy said:

Robert Priddy: “His case rested mainly on his having been able to make some false submissions to the petition before it was protected properly from such spamming (in its new location) – including a bogus entry he boasts about having made under the bogus name Joe Apodaco or the like. [Note that Joe Moreno gave no documentary proof he made that entry. However, it was removed just in case.]

At the same time Moreno states that he wrote (under the pseudonym) he had been “sexually abused” in the comment accompanying the sabotage signature! Interestingly – and perhaps unconsciously revealing a Freudian slip – for Joe Moreno was actually abused by Sathya Sai Baba, though he denies that the lowering of his pants and massaging with oil on his “lower stomach” was what the law (even in India) defines it as – sexual molestation when not performed with consent by a doctor of medicine. (See Basava Premanand’s discussion with Moreno on this)”

Sai Petition And The ‘Joe Apodaca’ Submission:

Click Here To Read More About The Bogus ‘Sai Petition’ that Robert Priddy made reference to. Of course, Robert Priddy miserably failed to inform his readers (as he typically does) that Moreno was able to submit multiple submissions to the Newer Sai Petition and those submissions were approved by the Sai Petition administrators!

The Older Sai Petition allowed for anyone to submit as many comments he/she so desired without any sort of verification process in place (with an admission from Robert Priddy himself). Therefore, the first 824 “signatures” on the Older Sai Petition have rightly been called into question by Robert Priddy himself. Thank you Mr. Priddles!

Why should Moreno provide “documentary proof” that he submitted the name of “Joe Apodaca” to the Sai Petition? If the Sai Petition is truly a legitimate and legal petition (as critic’s allege) they should be able to contact “Joe Apodaca” and verify the submission for themselves. The fact that critic’s were/are unable to verify Joe Apodaca’s submission is “documentary proof” enough that Moreno made it!

Robert Priddy Falsifies Yet Another Sexual Abuse Claim:

Robert Priddy: “At the same time Moreno states that he wrote (under the pseudonym) he had been “sexually abused” in the comment accompanying the sabotage signature!”

Robert Priddy falsely claimed that Moreno stated he had been “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba under the pseudonym of “Joe Apodaca”! Robert Priddy completely fabricated this claim and (once again) cannot source it to any verifiable references whatsoever.

However, Moreno can reference his rebuttal that he never (ever) submitted a signature to the bogus Sai Petition with any comment claiming (even indirectly) that he was “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba. See for yourself (names submitted were “Joe Apodaca”, “Joe M”, “J M”, “Isaac Nivek” and “Kevin Iassa”):

Under the name “Joe Apodaca”, Moreno said: “I had a friend who died at Sathya Sai Baba’s ashram”. Nowhere did Moreno claim (even indirectly) that he was “sexually abused” by Sathya Sai Baba as falsely and maliciously stated by senile Robert Priddy. See a screencap of the Google search results for yourself:

Moreno also sent Robert Priddy an email about the name “Joe Apodaca” on July 24th 2005:

From: Joe (July 24th 2005)
Subject: Remove Fake Name:
To: Robert Priddy

Dear Mr. Priddles,

I wanted to bring to your attention that you have published a fake name on your “Ex-Office Bearers” site, located at:

http://home.no.net/anir/Sai/saiorg/EX-OFFICE%20BEARERS.htm

If you had only cared to read my site a little more thoroughly, you would have noticed that I clearly stated that “Joe Apodaca” was one of several fake names I used to expose the inherent dishonesty in the submission policy at SaiPetition.net. I even provided a screen capture to these fake names (which has been on my site since November 2004)!

Check for yourself:
http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/sathya-sai-baba-and-petition-saipetitionnet.html

Although I used various derivatives of my name ‘Joe’ (2 of which were deleted from SaiPetition.net), I did not lie about knowing someone who died at Sathya Sai Baba’s Ashram. Michael Oliver was a very good friend of mine (his parents live 50 miles away from me). I was amazed that you met him (I read about it in your book). He never mentioned your name to me. Not even once.

At any rate, it makes one wonder why you would publish someone’s name, and a comment they made, without caring to verify their identity or their claim. This nicely makes my case that the signatures on SaiPetition.net are not verified (I happened to use a fake email as well). It also makes my case that Anti-Sai Activists (like yourself) disperse information ‘willy-nilly’, caring less for factual integrity and caring more for negative content.

Consequently, to save yourself further embarrassment, I suggest you make the necessary correction immediately. Although I must tell you that I have already screen captured the page and saved the cache. Maybe I can write an article, like the one you did with the Sai Organisation and the Westminster Cathedral? After all, you have such a fervent dedication to the truth, I am sure you wouldn’t mind if I applied the same standard to you that you apply to others.

Have a nice day.

Sincerely,

Joe Moreno

Further solidifying Moreno’s rebuttal are archived links going back to 2005 that prove Moreno never (ever) claimed he was sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba under his “Joe Apodaca” pseudonym:

1. View Original Article About The Apodaca Signature
   • Or View The November 19th 2005 Archive
2. View The Fake Name Google Cache
   • Or View The July 7th 2006 Archive
3. View Email Correspondence With Robert Priddy
   • Or View The July 19th 2006 Archive

Robert Priddy is a dirty old man who loves to tell dirty stories about others. Barry Pittard (a pseudo-moralist and heart-string-plucker extraordinaire) loves to revel in Robert Priddy’s dirty stories and actually endorses them! Of course, Barry Pittard has his own fair share of criticism regarding his highly questionable past. How can anyone believe anything Robert Priddy and Barry Pittard have to say about Sathya Sai Baba when they shamelessly libel others?

Pervert Priddy Continues Sexual Abuse Libels:

Robert Priddy formerly libeled Moreno as being “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba and claimed that Moreno said his pants were lowered by the Guru! Of course, Moreno never (ever) made the fabricated claims that Robert Priddy attributed to him. Now, however, Robert Priddy is claiming that Moreno said his “lower stomach” was “massaged” with oil by Sathya Sai Baba. Moreno never (ever) claimed he was “massaged” with oil. Alan Kazlev (Robert Priddy’s psychic & reincarnating friend) is to be attributed with that disinformation.

The big question is:

WHY is Robert Priddy so sexually focused on Moreno’s non-sexual interview?

Robert Priddy is like a sexual deviant who can’t stop fantasizing about the possibility that Moreno was sexually molested by Sathya Sai Baba and keeps on twisting Moreno’s words with sexual innuendo and sexual inferences not rooted in fact.

1. If Robert Priddy openly falsifies sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other sexual molestation claims is he fabricating as well?
2. If Barry Pittard openly endorses falsified sexual molestation claims against Moreno, what other falsified sexual molestation claims is he endorsing as well?

One must remember that Robert Priddy is actually trying to make the argument that even though Moreno explicitly stated he was not sexually abused by Sathya Sai Baba, one must ignore Moreno’s first-hand words and clarifications and instead rely on Robert Priddy’s sexual inferences based on descriptions he fabricated against Moreno! This from a man who claims he has not told a single lie!

Robert Priddy should stop embarrassing himself and the Anti-Sai Movement he defends. As one can see, Robert Priddy’s failing memory (strongly indicative of senile dementia) is getting him into a lot of trouble. Robert Priddy’s proven pathological lies have thoroughly compromised his so-called credibility and integrity. Those who support Robert Priddy’s gutter untruths (such as Barry Pittard, Timothy Conway, Kevin Shepherd, Alan Kazlev, Brian Steel, Serguei Badaev, Reinier Van Der Sandt, Andries Krugers Dagneaux, Basava Premanand, et al) are similarly compromised.

What next will come out of Robert Priddy’s mouth (besides spit, invective, libel and disinformation)? One can be certain that many things will come out of Robert Priddy’s mouth, but the truth won’t be one of them.