Dear Friends And Fellow Readers,
This article is part of a series written by Gerald Joe Moreno defending himself from absurd and libelous claims made by Ex-Devotees that he was “molested sexually” by Sathya Sai Baba. Since Ex-Devotees (particularly Barry Pittard and Robert Priddy) unremittingly and ceaselessly disperse this blatant disinformation on their WordPress blogs, a response is therefore necessary on WordPress.
Robert C. Priddy’s Homoerotic Genital Oilings Fascination
Gerald Joe Moreno has already written a rather lengthy article exposing the Homoerotic Fantasizer Robert C. Priddy. Further strengthening the argument that Robert C. Priddy appears to be projecting his latent homosexuality onto others is the irrefutable fact that Robert C. Priddy ceaselessly drools and monomaniacally blathers about “genital oilings” and describes them with great relish and in great detail although he never received or witnessed a single “genital oiling” himself! Why does Robert C. Priddy express so much fascination and intrigue with alleged “genital oilings” when he knows absolutely nothing about them except from what he’s heard through others?
Since Robert C. Priddy never received a so-called “genital oiling” from Sathya Sai Baba, why does he present himself as a proxy authority on “genital oilings”? The few alleged victims who claimed they received “oilings” are nowhere to be found, are completely silent on the issue and have since long disappeared from the internet scene. Why is Robert C. Priddy foaming at the mouth, raising a huge wail, gnashing his teeth and acting as a proxy spokesperson for alleged victims when he has no direct experience of what he alleges to be “irrefutably true”? Robert C. Priddy’s homoerotic assumptions, homoerotic speculations and homoerotic conspiracies about “genital oilings” arise solely from his groin and not from any first-hand experience. Robert C. Priddy is not credible and cannot be trusted to accurately or honestly relay details about alleged “genital oilings” because he openly fabricated a “genital oiling” account against Gerald Joe Moreno (and adamantly refuses to print a retraction).
- Robert C. Priddy is a laughable pervert who had the audacity to fabricate sexual molestation claims against Gerald Joe Moreno.
- Robert C. Priddy is a laughable con-artist who published fraudulent screencaps against Gerald Joe Moreno and adamantly refuses to vindicate his claims by publishing full screencaps to Moreno’s vishvarupa.com domain.
- Robert C. Priddy is a laughable stooge who attributed his own computer’s IP to Gerald Joe Moreno.
- Robert C. Priddy is in perpetual denial and publicly defends his laughable SheilaWaring Lie even though other critics have distanced themselves from that controversy.
- Robert Priddy is a laughable LSD Advocate who even cited a Pro-Drug Forum intended for Drug Users to defend his LSD-induced hallucinations.
- The list goes on and on.
The more Robert C. Priddy drools, squirms and obsesses over alleged “genital oilings”, the more one wonders why Robert C. Priddy is so thoroughly fascinated by that topic. More importantly, one is left to wonder why the parents to all of these alleged “victims” have never (ever) filed a single public grievance, basic police complaint or court case in India against the Guru.
Robert C. Priddy not only acts as a proxy spokesperson for alleged victims, he also acts as a “proxy guardian” because alleged victim’s mothers and fathers have all (without exception) failed in their moral, ethical and legal duties by ignoring the alleged molestations of their children. The reason why Robert C. Priddy does not shut up is because if he did, the silence would be deafening because no one else besides critics are making all the fuss.
Ex-Devotees (including Robert C. Priddy) ceaselessly reference the alleged credibility of Ullrich Zimmermann (a German ex-devotee of Sathya Sai Baba and current devotee of the alleged 35,000 year-old Lemurian Warrior and Ascended Master “Ramtha”). Although Ullrich Zimmermann made several unbelievable and graphic claims about Sathya Sai Baba (which he originally recalled while drunk at a Ramtha “wine ceremony”), Ullrich Zimmermann related an alleged oiling experience that was completely and wholly non-sexual.
According to Ullrich Zimmermann, Sathya Sai Baba rubbed materialized oil down the “kundalini line” on his chest and was instantaneously and miraculously cured of a chronic breathing ailment due to too much smoking. Although Ullrich Zimmermann apparently had nothing to hide and divulged alleged “tantric” experiences with the Guru, his only alleged “oiling” experience never involved his pubic region or genitals and he never had his pants pulled down.
Since Robert C. Priddy believes Ullrich Zimmermann (despite bashing and trashing channelers, mediums and New Age believers as belonging to the “lunatic fringe” seen in cults, ashrams and New Religious Movements), one is left to wonder why Robert Priddy ceaselessly fantasizes about “genital oilings” when Ullrich Zimmermann (who apparently had nothing to hide) described his “oiling” to be wholly and completely non-sexual. As a matter of fact, Ullrich Zimmermann’s mother is still a Sai Devotee and apparently felt that her son’s alleged encounters with Sathya Sai Baba were just as miraculous and wonderful as he described them to be. Ullrich Zimmermann even claimed that his alleged “white tantric” experiences with Sathya Sai Baba were “honors” conferred upon him (which made the person filming Zimmermann’s account gasp out loud)!
In conclusion, Robert C. Priddy needs to shut up and let the alleged victims and their mothers and fathers talk for themselves. The fact that alleged victims and their mothers and fathers are not talking strongly suggests that Sathya Sai Baba did nothing wrong. Robert C. Priddy should take his gripes to the parents of alleged victims and should be castigating them for ignoring their children’s alleged molestations.
Sathya Sai Baba has never (ever) been charged with any crime, sexual or otherwise and critics cannot provide a scintilla of credible or verifiable information to the contrary.